Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25372225›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2014

Secular trends in invasive meningococcal disease, Massachusetts, 1988-2011: what happened to invasive disease?

A H Peruski, P Kludt, R S Patel, A DeMaria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A H PeruskiBoston University School of Public Health,Boston, MA,USA.
P KludtMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Jamaica Plain, MA,USA.
R S PatelNorth End Waterfront Health Center, Boston, Massachusetts,USA.
A DeMariaMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Jamaica Plain, MA,USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) reported to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health from 1988 to 2011 was reviewed. The average annual incidence of IMD/100 000 decreased from 1·57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·42-1·73] for 1988-1991 to 0·22 (95% CI 0·17-0·29) for 2008-2011. The pattern of decreasing incidence over time differed by age group. There was a decrease in IMD/100 000 in the 0-4 years age group after 1991 from 10·92 (95% CI 8·08-14·70) in 1991 to 5·76 (95% CI 3·78-8·72) in 1992. Incidence in the 0-4 years age group remained below 5/100 000 per year on average thereafter. A substantial reduction in incidence in all age groups was observed between 2000 and 2009, which began before the introduction of conjugate meningococcal vaccine in 2005. Marked reductions in incidence of IMD in Massachusetts, and elsewhere, deserve further investigation with respect to potential factors that go beyond the introduction and deployment of improved meningococcal vaccines.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMassachusettsMeningococcal InfectionsMeningococcal VaccinesMeningococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25372225
PMCPMC9151323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.