Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25371812›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2014

Clinical and economic consequences of hospital-acquired resistant and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dilip Nathwani, Gowri Raman, Katherine Sulham, Meghan Gavaghan, Vandana Menon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 340 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Risk factors for hospitalized patients with resistant or multidrug-resistantAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Pathogenicity ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dilip NathwaniNinewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland DD19SY UK.
Gowri RamanTufts Medical Center for Evidence Synthesis, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, 800 Washington Street, Box 63, Boston, MA 02111 USA.
Katherine SulhamGfK Market Access, LLC, 21 Cochituate Rd, Wayland, MA 01778 USA.
Meghan GavaghanGfK Market Access, LLC, 21 Cochituate Rd, Wayland, MA 01778 USA.
Vandana MenonCubist Pharmaceuticals, 65 Hayden Ave, Lexington, MA 02421 USA.
GfK (United States) · USCubist Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USNinewells Hospital · GBTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing rates of resistant and multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa in hospitalized patients constitute a major public health threat. We present a systematic review of the clinical and economic impact of this resistant pathogen.

methodsStudies indexed in MEDLINE and Cochrane databases between January 2000-February 2013, and reported all-cause mortality, length of stay, hospital costs, readmission, or recurrence in at least 20 hospitalized patients with laboratory confirmed resistant P. aeruginosa infection were included. We accepted individual study definitions of MDR, and assessed study methodological quality.

resultsThe most common definition of MDR was resistance to more than one agent in three or more categories of antibiotics. Twenty-three studies (7,881 patients with susceptible P. aeruginosa, 1,653 with resistant P. aeruginosa, 559 with MDR P. aeruginosa, 387 non-infected patients without P. aeruginosa) were analyzed. A random effects model meta-analysis was feasible for the endpoint of all-cause in-hospital mortality. All-cause mortality was 34% (95% confidence interval (CI) 27% - 41%) in patients with any resistant P. aeruginosa compared to 22% (95% CI 14% - 29%) with susceptible P. aeruginosa. The meta-analysis demonstrated a > 2-fold increased risk of mortality with MDR P. aeruginosa (relative risk (RR) 2.34, 95% CI 1.53 - 3.57) and a 24% increased risk with resistant P. aeruginosa (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11 - 1.38), compared to susceptible P. aeruginosa. An adjusted meta-analysis of data from seven studies demonstrated a statistically non-significant increased risk of mortality in patients with any resistant P. aeruginosa (adjusted RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98 - 1.57). All three studies that reported infection-related mortality found a statistically significantly increased risk in patients with MDR P. aeruginosa compared to those with susceptible P. aeruginosa. Across studies, hospital length of stay (LOS) was higher in patients with resistant and MDR P. aeruginosa infections, compared to susceptible P. aeruginosa and control patients. Limitations included heterogeneity in MDR definition, restriction to nosocomial infections, and potential confounding in analyses.

conclusionsHospitalized patients with resistant and MDR P. aeruginosa infections appear to have increased all-cause mortality and LOS. The negative clinical and economic impact of these pathogens warrants in-depth evaluation of optimal infection prevention and stewardship strategies.

Indexed as

All-cause mortalityPseudomonas aeruginosaResistance

Identifiers

PMID25371812
PMCPMC4219028
OpenAlexW2103360123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.