ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2014
Spatial localization of recent ancestors for admixed individuals.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- KLFDAPC: a supervised machine learning approach for spatial genetic structure analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Inferring the ancestry of parents and grandparents from genetic data.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Application of the geographic population structure (GPS) algorithm for biogeographical analyses of wild and captive gorillas.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Article
- Between Lake Baikal and the Baltic Sea: genomic history of the gateway to Europe.BMC genetics · 2017Article
- The Origins of Ashkenaz, Ashkenazic Jews, and Yiddish.Frontiers in genetics · 2017Article
- Toward high-resolution population genomics using archaeological samples.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2016Review
- A genomic perspective on hybridization and speciation.Molecular ecology · 2016Review
- A Spatial Framework for Understanding Population Structure and Admixture.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Differential Evolution approach to detect recent admixture.BMC genomics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ancestry analysis from genetic data plays a critical role in studies of human disease and evolution. Recent work has introduced explicit models for the geographic distribution of genetic variation and has shown that such explicit models yield superior accuracy in ancestry inference over nonmodel-based methods. Here we extend such work to introduce a method that models admixture between ancestors from multiple sources across a geographic continuum. We devise efficient algorithms based on hidden Markov models to localize on a map the recent ancestors (e.g., grandparents) of admixed individuals, joint with assigning ancestry at each locus in the genome. We validate our methods by using empirical data from individuals with mixed European ancestry from the Population Reference Sample study and show that our approach is able to localize their recent ancestors within an average of 470 km of the reported locations of their grandparents. Furthermore, simulations from real Population Reference Sample genotype data show that our method attains high accuracy in localizing recent ancestors of admixed individuals in Europe (an average of 550 km from their true location for localization of two ancestries in Europe, four generations ago). We explore the limits of ancestry localization under our approach and find that performance decreases as the number of distinct ancestries and generations since admixture increases. Finally, we build a map of expected localization accuracy across admixed individuals according to the location of origin within Europe of their ancestors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.