Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25371447›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2015

Endogenous sex hormones and breast density in young women.

Seungyoun Jung, Frank Z Stanczyk, Brian L Egleston, Linda G Snetselaar, Victor J Stevens, John A Shepherd, Linda Van Horn, Erin S LeBlanc, Kenneth Paris, Catherine Klifa and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Field cancerization in breast cancer.The Journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Seungyoun JungUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Frank Z StanczykUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Brian L EglestonFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Linda G SnetselaarUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Victor J StevensKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
John A ShepherdUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Linda Van HornFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Erin S LeBlancKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Kenneth ParisLouisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Catherine KlifaDangeard Group, San Francisco, California.
Joanne F DorganUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. jdorgan@som.umaryland.edu.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Adolescent Diet, Hormones &Breast Cancer SusceptibilityR01CA104670 · NCI · FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER · PI DORGAN, JOANNE F · 2005 to 2008
$4.4M
Adolescent Sex Hormones and Breast Density in Young WomenR03CA167764 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI DORGAN, JOANNE F · 2013 to 2014
$173k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104670NCI NIH HHS R03 CA167764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer and reflects epithelial and stromal content. Breast tissue is particularly sensitive to hormonal stimuli before it fully differentiates following the first full-term pregnancy. Few studies have examined associations between sex hormones and breast density among young women.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study among 180 women ages 25 to 29 years old who participated in the Dietary Intervention Study in Children 2006 Follow-up Study. Eighty-five percent of participants attended a clinic visit during their luteal phase of menstrual cycle. Magnetic resonance imaging measured the percentage of dense breast volume (%DBV), absolute dense breast volume (ADBV), and absolute nondense breast volume (ANDBV). Multiple-linear mixed-effect regression models were used to evaluate the association of sex hormones and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) with %DBV, ADBV, and ANDBV.

resultsTestosterone was significantly positively associated with %DBV and ADBV. The multivariable geometric mean of %DBV and ADBV across testosterone quartiles increased from 16.5% to 20.3% and from 68.6 to 82.3 cm(3), respectively (Ptrend ≤ 0.03). There was no association of %DBV or ADBV with estrogens, progesterone, non-SHBG-bound testosterone, or SHBG (Ptrend ≥ 0.27). Neither sex hormones nor SHBG was associated with ANDBV except progesterone; however, the progesterone result was nonsignificant in analysis restricted to women in the luteal phase.

conclusionsThese findings suggest a modest positive association between testosterone and breast density in young women. IMPACT: Hormonal influences at critical periods may contribute to morphologic differences in the breast associated with breast cancer risk later in life.

Indexed as

AdultBreastBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEstradiolEstrogensFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRisk FactorsTestosteroneEstradiolEstrogensTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID25371447
PMCPMC4323882
OpenAlexW2108201031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.