Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25371446›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2015

Recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Mexican women with breast cancer.

Gabriela Torres-Mejía, Robert Royer, Marcia Llacuachaqui, Mohammad R Akbari, Anna R Giuliano, Louis Martínez-Matsushita, Angélica Angeles-Llerenas, Carolina Ortega-Olvera, Elad Ziv, Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathogenic variants inJournal of medicine and life · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Identification and Computational Analysis ofMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Molecular Characterization of the Allelic Expression of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Landscape of germlineFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identification of Eleven NovelFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriela Torres-MejíaInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Robert RoyerWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marcia LlacuachaquiWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mohammad R AkbariWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anna R GiulianoCenter for Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Population Sciences Division, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Louis Martínez-MatsushitaInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Angélica Angeles-LlerenasInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Carolina Ortega-OlveraInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Elad ZivDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Institute for Human Genetics; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Eduardo Lazcano-PonceInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Catherine M PhelanDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Population Sciences Division, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida. Catherine.phelan@moffitt.org.
Steven A NarodWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
U-M Rogel Cancer Center

Funding

Admixture Mapping for Breast Cancer in LatinasR01CA120120 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZIV, ELAD · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
Integrative Molecular Epidemiology WorkshopR25CA174664 · NCI · AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH · PI Shelley S Tworoger · 2013 to 2026
$2.8M
Genetics of mammographic density and breast cancer risk in LatinasK24CA169004 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZIV, ELAD · 2012 to 2021
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA169004NCI NIH HHS K24CA169004NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120120NCI NIH HHS R01CA120120NCI NIH HHS R25 CA174664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGermline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer an estimated 58% to 80% lifetime risk of breast cancer. In general, screening is done for cancer patients if a relative has been diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer. There are few data on the prevalence of mutations in these genes in Mexican women with breast cancer and this hampers efforts to develop screening policies in Mexico.

methodsWe screened 810 unselected women with breast cancer from three cities in Mexico (Mexico City, Veracruz, and Monterrey) for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, including a panel of 26 previously reported mutations.

resultsThirty-five mutations were identified in 34 women (4.3% of total) including 20 BRCA1 mutations and 15 BRCA2 mutations. Twenty-two of the 35 mutations were recurrent mutations (62.8%). Only five of the 34 mutation carriers had a first-degree relative with breast cancer (three with BRCA1 and two with BRCA2 mutations).

conclusionThese results support the rationale for a strategy of screening for recurrent mutations in all women with breast cancer in Mexico, as opposed to restricting screening to those with a sister or mother with breast or ovarian cancer. IMPACT: These results will impact cancer genetic testing in Mexico and the identification of at-risk individuals who will benefit from increased surveillance. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(3); 498-505. ©2014 AACR.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMexicoMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID25371446
PMCPMC4495576
OpenAlexW2129345408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.