Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25371178›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2015

The impact of SF3B1 mutations in CLL on the DNA-damage response.

G D Te Raa, I A M Derks, V Navrkalova, A Skowronska, P D Moerland, J van Laar, C Oldreive, H Monsuur, M Trbusek, J Malcikova and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Distinct and convergent effects ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Haematologica · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

G D Te Raa1] Department of Hematology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [2] Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I A M DerksDepartment of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
V NavrkalovaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
A SkowronskaSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
P D MoerlandBioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J van Laar1] Department of Hematology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [2] Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C OldreiveSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
H MonsuurDepartment of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M TrbusekDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
J MalcikovaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
M LodénMRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C H GeislerDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J HülleinDepartment of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
A JethwaDepartment of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
T Zenz1] Department of Translational Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany [2] Department of Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
S PospisilovaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
T StankovicSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
M H J van Oers1] Department of Hematology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [2] Lymphoma and Myeloma Center Amsterdam (LYMMCARE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A P Kater1] Department of Hematology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [2] Lymphoma and Myeloma Center Amsterdam (LYMMCARE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E Eldering1] Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [2] Lymphoma and Myeloma Center Amsterdam (LYMMCARE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLCentral European Institute of Technology – Masaryk University · CZUniversity of Birmingham · GBGerman Cancer Research Center · DEMRC Holland (Netherlands) · NLNational Center for Tumor Diseases · DERigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations or deletions in TP53 or ATM are well-known determinants of poor prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but only account for approximately 40% of chemo-resistant patients. Genome-wide sequencing has uncovered novel mutations in the splicing factor sf3b1, that were in part associated with ATM aberrations, suggesting functional synergy. We first performed detailed genetic analyses in a CLL cohort (n=110) containing ATM, SF3B1 and TP53 gene defects. Next, we applied a newly developed multiplex assay for p53/ATM target gene induction and measured apoptotic responses to DNA damage. Interestingly, SF3B1 mutated samples without concurrent ATM and TP53 aberrations (sole SF3B1) displayed partially defective ATM/p53 transcriptional and apoptotic responses to various DNA-damaging regimens. In contrast, NOTCH1 or K/N-RAS mutated CLL displayed normal responses in p53/ATM target gene induction and apoptosis. In sole SF3B1 mutated cases, ATM kinase function remained intact, and γH2AX formation, a marker for DNA damage, was increased at baseline and upon irradiation. Our data demonstrate that single mutations in sf3b1 are associated with increased DNA damage and/or an aberrant response to DNA damage. Together, our observations may offer an explanation for the poor prognosis associated with SF3B1 mutations.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, LeukemicMutationApoptosisAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCohort StudiesDNA DamageDNA Mutational AnalysisDoxorubicinFlow CytometryGene DeletionGenome, HumanHistonesHumansImidazolesLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellPhosphoproteinsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanDoxorubicinfludarabineH2AX protein, humanHistonesImidazolesNOTCH1 protein, humannutlin 3PhosphoproteinsPiperazinesReceptor, Notch1Ribonucleoprotein, U2 Small NuclearRNA Splicing FactorsSF3B1 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Vidarabine

Identifiers

PMID25371178
OpenAlexW2066331460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.