Utility of evaluating HCV in an uninsured population.

objectivesAlthough effective HCV treatment is available, it can be difficult to access for uninsured, urban patients. Our aim was to assess the utility of evaluation and outcomes in the uninsured with HCV when access to health care and treatment with triple therapy is provided.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients referred for HCV from 2011 to June 2013 to an indigent HCV clinic. The primary outcomes were assessment of disease severity by noninvasive means and initiation of therapy.

resultsWe identified 350 patients: mean age 50.6, 84 % with no insurance, 62 % men, 58 % black, 91 % HCV treatment naïve. Of these, 148 underwent liver biopsy and 68 % had F0-F1 and 10 % had F3-F4 fibrosis. FIB-4 and APRI were highly correlated (r = 0.9; p < .0001) and correctly classified patients by fibrosis strata (F0-F1, F2, and F3-F4; p = .0004). When combined, a FIB-4 ≤1.5 and APRI ≤0.5 correctly classified the absence of advanced disease in 97 % (p < .0001). Of those evaluated, 39 (11 %) went on to HCV treatment. Of those not in a clinical trial, 51 % completed treatment with SVR in 61 % with genotype 1 and 75 % in genotypenon-1. Of those not treated (n = 309), the most common reasons were mild disease (16 %), lost to follow-up (23 %), ongoing alcohol or substance abuse (24 %), and uncontrolled depression (10 %).

conclusionNoninvasive assessment can accurately exclude advanced fibrosis. Despite access to care, the utility of evaluating to initiate HCV treatment is low suggesting that eliminating the barrier to health care may not increase HCV treatment.