Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25370816›Full record

ArticleHuman psychopharmacology2015

Simultaneous co-ingestion of prescription stimulants, alcohol and other drugs: a multi-cohort national study of US adolescents.

Sean Esteban McCabe, Brady T West, Ty S Schepis, Christian J Teter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prescription Drug Misuse: Taking a Lifespan Perspective.Substance abuse : research and treatment · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Leveraging user perspectives for insight into cannabis concentrates.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sean Esteban McCabeInstitute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Substance Abuse Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Brady T West
Ty S Schepis
Christian J Teter

Funding

Monitoring the Future: Drug Use & Lifestyles of American Youth (Supp1: Nicotine Pouch and E-cigarette Use Among US Adolescents: National Estimates of Brand Use and Flavor Preferences)R01DA001411 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Richard A Miech · 1985 to 2026
$144.9M
SUBSTANCE ABUSE INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007267 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GNEGY, MARGARET E · 1994 to 2015
$4.5M
Trajectories of Prescription Nonmedical Drug MisuseR01DA031160 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SEAN ESTEBAN MCCABE · 2011 to 2026
$3.7M
A Prospective Study of the Nonmedical use of Prescription Medications by AdolesceR01DA024678 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BOYD, CAROL J · 2009 to 2013
$3.0M
Longitudinal Changes in Recovery from Drug Use Disorders: A National StudyR01DA036541 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MCCABE, SEAN ESTEBAN · 2015 to 2017
$647k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA001411NIDA NIH HHS R01DA01411NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024678NIDA NIH HHS R01DA024678NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031160NIDA NIH HHS R01DA031160NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036541NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the past-year prevalence rates and correlates of simultaneous co-ingestion of prescription stimulants and other substances among US high school seniors.

methodsNationally representative probability samples of US high school seniors were surveyed as a part of the Monitoring the Future study. The sample consisted of five cohorts including a total of 12,431 high school seniors (modal age: 18 years) and represented a population that was 53% female.

resultsAmong past-year nonmedical users of prescription stimulants (n = 835), the estimated prevalence of any past-year simultaneous co-ingestion of prescription stimulants and other substances was 64.4%. The substances most commonly co-ingested with prescription stimulants included marijuana (51.1%) and alcohol (48.4%). Nonmedical users who co-ingested prescription stimulants with other substances were more likely to report non-oral routes of administration, recreational motives and greater subjective high when using prescription stimulants than nonmedical users who did not co-ingest prescription stimulants with other substances.

conclusionsThe majority of past-year nonmedical users of prescription stimulants reported simultaneous co-ingestion of prescription stimulants and other substances. The findings indicate that co-ingestion of prescription stimulants and other substances is a pervasive behavior among US adolescents who engage in nonmedical use of prescription stimulants and should be carefully considered in future clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System AgentsEthanolPrescription DrugsSmokingAdolescentCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesCentral Nervous System AgentsEthanolPrescription Drugsadolescentsco-ingestionpolydrug useprescription stimulantssimultaneous use

Identifiers

PMID25370816
PMCPMC4362718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.