Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25370645›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2014

Towards the clinical implementation of iterative low-dose cone-beam CT reconstruction in image-guided radiation therapy: cone/ring artifact correction and multiple GPU implementation.

Hao Yan, Xiaoyu Wang, Feng Shi, Ti Bai, Michael Folkerts, Laura Cervino, Steve B Jiang, Xun Jia

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Low-dose CBCT image reconstruction: a review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hao YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390.
Xiaoyu WangCenter for Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies and Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037.
Feng ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390.
Ti BaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390 and Institute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China.
Michael FolkertsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390 and Department of Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037.
Laura CervinoCenter for Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies and Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037.
Steve B JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390.
Xun JiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Low dose cone beam CT for image guided adaptive radiotherapyR01CA154747 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIANG, STEVE BIN · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
A progressive cone-beam CT dose control scheme for image-guided radiation therapyR21CA178787 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN · 2014 to 2015
$380k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA154747-01NCI NIH HHS 1R21 CA178787-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154747NCI NIH HHS R21 CA178787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCompressed sensing (CS)-based iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques are able to reconstruct cone-beam CT (CBCT) images from undersampled noisy data, allowing for imaging dose reduction. However, there are a few practical concerns preventing the clinical implementation of these techniques. On the image quality side, data truncation along the superior-inferior direction under the cone-beam geometry produces severe cone artifacts in the reconstructed images. Ring artifacts are also seen in the half-fan scan mode. On the reconstruction efficiency side, the long computation time hinders clinical use in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT).

methodsImage quality improvement methods are proposed to mitigate the cone and ring image artifacts in IR. The basic idea is to use weighting factors in the IR data fidelity term to improve projection data consistency with the reconstructed volume. In order to improve the computational efficiency, a multiple graphics processing units (GPUs)-based CS-IR system was developed. The parallelization scheme, detailed analyses of computation time at each step, their relationship with image resolution, and the acceleration factors were studied. The whole system was evaluated in various phantom and patient cases.

resultsRing artifacts can be mitigated by properly designing a weighting factor as a function of the spatial location on the detector. As for the cone artifact, without applying a correction method, it contaminated 13 out of 80 slices in a head-neck case (full-fan). Contamination was even more severe in a pelvis case under half-fan mode, where 36 out of 80 slices were affected, leading to poorer soft tissue delineation and reduced superior-inferior coverage. The proposed method effectively corrects those contaminated slices with mean intensity differences compared to FDK results decreasing from ∼497 and ∼293 HU to ∼39 and ∼27 HU for the full-fan and half-fan cases, respectively. In terms of efficiency boost, an overall 3.1 × speedup factor has been achieved with four GPU cards compared to a single GPU-based reconstruction. The total computation time is ∼30 s for typical clinical cases.

conclusionsThe authors have developed a low-dose CBCT IR system for IGRT. By incorporating data consistency-based weighting factors in the IR model, cone/ring artifacts can be mitigated. A boost in computational efficiency is achieved by multi-GPU implementation.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsCone-Beam Computed TomographyRadiation DosageRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedAlgorithmsArtifactsHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25370645
PMCPMC4241832
OpenAlexW2006366199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.