Trial reportJournal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society2015
Vision in a phase 3 trial of natalizumab for multiple sclerosis: relation to disability and quality of life.
Trial report in Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating colour vision and its structural correlates 15 years following a first demyelinating event.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025Article
- From diagnosis to treatment: exploring the mechanisms underlying optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Visual Impairment in Hemodialyzed Patients-An IVIS Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Where's the Vision? The Importance of Visual Outcomes in Neurologic Disorders: The 2021 H. Houston Merritt Lecture.Neurology · 2023Review
- Technology-enabled comprehensive characterization of multiple sclerosis in clinical practice.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2020Article
- Retinal measurements predict 10-year disability in multiple sclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019Article
- Evolution of Visual Outcomes in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2018Review
- Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2017Review
- Assessing the Value of Treatment to Address Various Symptoms Associated with Multiple Sclerosis: Results from a Contingent Valuation Study.PharmacoEconomics · 2016Article
- Binocular low-contrast letter acuity and the symbol digit modalities test improve the ability of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite to predict disease in pediatric multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2016Article
- Induced Stem Cells as a Novel Multiple Sclerosis Therapy.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow-contrast visual acuity (LCVA), a sensitive measure of visual function in multiple sclerosis (MS), demonstrated treatment effects as a secondary outcome measure in the Phase 3 trial of natalizumab, AFFIRM. In these posttrial analyses, we studied the relation of visual function to quality of life (QOL), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores.
methodsAt baseline and at 52 and 104 weeks in AFFIRM, patients underwent binocular testing of LCVA (1.25% and 2.5% contrast) and high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA). Vision-specific QOL was assessed by the Impact of Visual Impairment Scale (IVIS), whereas the SF-36 Health Survey and Visual Analog Scale were administered as generic QOL measures and the EDSS as a measure of neurologic impairment.
resultsAmong QOL measures, IVIS scores showed the most significant correlations with visual dysfunction at all time points in the trial (r= -0.25 to -0.45, P < 0.0001 for LCVA and HCVA). Higher MRI T1- and T2-lesion volumes were also associated with worse vision scores at all time points (P < 0.0001). Clinically meaningful worsening (progression) of LCVA was noted in substantial proportions of patients in AFFIRM and was prevalent even among those without EDSS progression over 2 years (21.9% with LCVA progression at 2.5% contrast; 26.2% at 1.25% contrast). HCVA worsened in only 3.7% of patients without EDSS progression.
conclusionsLoss of visual function, particularly as measured by LCVA, was common in AFFIRM, occurring in >20% of patients. Both LCVA and HCVA scores reflect vision-specific aspects of QOL, but LCVA provides information about disability progression not entirely captured by the EDSS. Vision represents a key dimension of outcome assessment for MS and adds valuable information on disability and QOL that can be useful to clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.