Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25370366›Full record

ArticleExtremophiles : life under extreme conditions2015

Desulfosporosinus acididurans sp. nov.: an acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from acidic sediments.

Irene Sánchez-Andrea, Alfons J M Stams, Sabrina Hedrich, Ivan Ňancucheo, D Barrie Johnson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Characterization of an enriched acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria community from the sediment of a uranium mine (Minas Gerais-Brazil).Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Sustained bacterial NNature communications · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Vitamin BGenes · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Irene Sánchez-AndreaLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 10, 6703 HB, Wageningen, The Netherlands, irene.sanchezandrea@wur.nl.
Alfons J M Stams
Sabrina Hedrich
Ivan Ňancucheo
D Barrie Johnson
Wageningen University & Research · NLArturo Prat University · CLBangor University · GBFederal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three strains of sulfate-reducing bacteria (M1(T), D, and E) were isolated from acidic sediments (White river and Tinto river) and characterized phylogenetically and physiologically. All three strains were obligately anaerobic, mesophilic, spore-forming straight rods, stained Gram-negative and displayed variable motility during active growth. The pH range for growth was 3.8-7.0, with an optimum at pH 5.5. The temperature range for growth was 15-40 °C, with an optimum at 30 °C. Strains M1(T), D, and E used a wide range of electron donors and acceptors, with certain variability within the different strains. The nominated type strain (M1(T)) used ferric iron, nitrate, sulfate, elemental sulfur, and thiosulfate (but not arsenate, sulfite, or fumarate) as electron acceptors, and organic acids (formate, lactate, butyrate, fumarate, malate, and pyruvate), alcohols (glycerol, methanol, and ethanol), yeast extract, and sugars (xylose, glucose, and fructose) as electron donors. It also fermented some substrates such as pyruvate and formate. Strain M1(T) tolerated up to 50 mM ferrous iron and 10 mM aluminum, but was inhibited by 1 mM copper. On the basis of phenotypic, phylogenetic, and genetic characteristics, strains M1(T), D, and E represent a novel species within the genus Desulfosporosinus, for which the name Desulfosporosinus acididurans sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is M1(T) (=DSM 27692(T) = JCM 19471(T)). Strain M1(T) was the first acidophilic SRB isolated, and it is the third described species of acidophilic SRB besides Desulfosporosinus acidiphilus and Thermodesulfobium narugense.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnaerobiosisBacterial Typing TechniquesDNA, BacterialGenomicsGeologic SedimentsGram-Negative BacteriaHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastOxygenRiversRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpainSulfatesSulfur-Reducing BacteriaTemperatureDNA, BacterialOxygenRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSulfates

Identifiers

PMID25370366
OpenAlexW2031115618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.