Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25370312›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2015

A 3D active model framework for segmentation of proximal femur in MR images.

Sadaf Arezoomand, Won-Sook Lee, Kawan S Rakhra, Paul E Beaulé

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sadaf ArezoomandSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, sadaf.arezoomand@uottawa.ca.
Won-Sook Lee
Kawan S Rakhra
Paul E Beaulé

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSegmentation of osseous structures from clinical MR images is difficult due to acquisition artifacts and variable signal intensity of bones. Segmentation of femoral head is required for evaluation of hip joint abnormalities such as cam- type femoroacetabular impingement. A parametric deformable model (PDM) framework was developed for segmentation of 3D magnetic resonance (MR) images of the hip.

methodA two-phase segmentation scheme was implemented: (i) Radial basis function interpolation was performed for semi-automatic piecewise registration of a proximal femur atlas model to an MRI scan region of interest. User-defined control points on the mesh model were registered to the corresponding landmarks on the image. (ii) An active PDM was then used for coarse-to-fine level segmentation. The segmentation technique was tested using 3D synthetic image data and clinical MR scans of the hip with varying resolution.

resultsThe segmentation method provided a mean target overlap of 0.95 and misclassification error of 0.035 for the synthetic data. The average target overlap was 0.88, and misclassification error rate was 0.12 for the clinical MRI data sets.

conclusionA framework for segmentation of proximal femur in hip MRI scans was developed and tested. This method is robust to artifacts and intensity inhomogeneity and resistant to leakage into adjacent tissues. In comparison with slicewise segmentation techniques, this method features inter-slice consistency, which results in a smooth model of the proximal femur in hip MRI scans.

Indexed as

Femoracetabular ImpingementFemurFemur HeadHip JointHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, Anatomic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.