Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25370306›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Preen secretions encode information on MHC similarity in certain sex-dyads in a monogamous seabird.

Sarah Leclaire, Wouter F D van Dongen, Steeve Voccia, Thomas Merkling, Christine Ducamp, Scott A Hatch, Pierrick Blanchard, Etienne Danchin, Richard H Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah Leclaire1] CNRS, UPS, ENFA; Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB), UMR5174, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France [2] Université de Toulouse, EDB, UMR5174, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Wouter F D van Dongen1] Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Integrative Biology and Evolution, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Savoyenstrasse 1a, 1160 Vienna, Austria [2] Applied Ecology Research Group and Institute for Sustainability and Innovation, College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University - Footscray Park Campus, PO Box 14428, Melbourne MC, VIC, Australia 8001.
Steeve Voccia1] CNRS, UPS, ENFA; Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB), UMR5174, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France [2] Université de Toulouse, EDB, UMR5174, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Thomas Merkling1] CNRS, UPS, ENFA; Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB), UMR5174, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France [2] Université de Toulouse, EDB, UMR5174, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Christine Ducamp1] CNRS, UPS, ENFA; Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB), UMR5174, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France [2] Université de Toulouse, EDB, UMR5174, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Scott A HatchU.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508, USA.
Pierrick Blanchard1] CNRS, UPS, ENFA; Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB), UMR5174, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France [2] Université de Toulouse, EDB, UMR5174, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Etienne Danchin1] CNRS, UPS, ENFA; Laboratoire Évolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB), UMR5174, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France [2] Université de Toulouse, EDB, UMR5174, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Richard H WagnerKonrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Integrative Biology and Evolution, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Savoyenstrasse 1a, 1160 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals are known to select mates to maximize the genetic diversity of their offspring in order to achieve immunity against a broader range of pathogens. Although several bird species preferentially mate with partners that are dissimilar at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), it remains unknown whether they can use olfactory cues to assess MHC similarity with potential partners. Here we combined gas chromatography data with genetic similarity indices based on MHC to test whether similarity in preen secretion chemicals correlated with MHC relatedness in the black-legged kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla), a species that preferentially mates with genetically dissimilar partners. We found that similarity in preen secretion chemicals was positively correlated with MHC relatedness in male-male and male-female dyads. This study provides the first evidence that preen secretion chemicals can encode information on MHC relatedness and suggests that odor-based mechanisms of MHC-related mate choice may occur in birds.

Indexed as

AllelesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAvian ProteinsCharadriiformesFemaleGenetic VariationGroomingHistocompatibility AntigensMaleMating Preference, AnimalMolecular Sequence DataOdorantsScent GlandsAvian ProteinsHistocompatibility Antigens

Identifiers

PMID25370306
PMCPMC4220275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.