Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25370201›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2015

Systematic review and proposal of a field-based physical fitness-test battery in preschool children: the PREFIT battery.

Francisco B Ortega, Cristina Cadenas-Sánchez, Guillermo Sánchez-Delgado, José Mora-González, Borja Martínez-Téllez, Enrique G Artero, Jose Castro-Piñero, Idoia Labayen, Palma Chillón, Marie Löf and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04269135 (Preschool Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 124 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04269135 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Preschool Children: Fit, Healthy and Smart: PREFIT-Chile - Study Linking Physical Fitness to Non Invasive Health-Related Markers and Executive Function

TypeobservationalSponsorPlaya Ancha UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled868ConditionsChild, Preschool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 278 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Francisco B OrtegaPROFITH "PROmoting FITness and Health through physical activity" Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Carretera de Alfacar s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain, ortegaf@ugr.es.
Cristina Cadenas-Sánchez
Guillermo Sánchez-Delgado
José Mora-González
Borja Martínez-Téllez
Enrique G Artero
Jose Castro-Piñero
Idoia Labayen
Palma Chillón
Marie Löf
Jonatan R Ruiz
Universidad de Granada · ESKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversidad de Cádiz · ESUniversity of Almería · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical fitness is a powerful health marker in childhood and adolescence, and it is reasonable to think that it might be just as important in younger children, i.e. preschoolers. At the moment, researchers, clinicians and sport practitioners do not have enough information about which fitness tests are more reliable, valid and informative from the health point of view to be implemented in preschool children.

objectiveOur aim was to systematically review the studies conducted in preschool children using field-based fitness tests, and examine their (1) reliability, (2) validity, and (3) relationship with health outcomes. Our ultimate goal was to propose a field-based physical fitness-test battery to be used in preschool children. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Web of Science. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies conducted in healthy preschool children that included field-based fitness tests. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsWhen using PubMed, we included Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms to enhance the power of the search. A set of fitness-related terms were combined with 'child, preschool' [MeSH]. The same strategy and terms were used for Web of Science (except for the MeSH option). Since no previous reviews with a similar aim were identified, we searched for all articles published up to 1 April 2014 (no starting date). A total of 2,109 articles were identified, of which 22 articles were finally selected for this review.

resultsMost studies focused on reliability of the fitness tests (n = 21, 96%), while very few focused on validity (0 criterion-related validity and 4 (18%) convergent validity) or relationship with health outcomes (0 longitudinal and 1 (5%) cross-sectional study). Motor fitness, particularly balance, was the most studied fitness component, while cardiorespiratory fitness was the least studied. After analyzing the information retrieved in the current systematic review about fitness testing in preschool children, we propose the PREFIT battery, field-based FITness testing in PREschool children. The PREFIT battery is composed of the following tests: the 20 m shuttle-run test for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness, the handgrip-strength and the standing long-jump tests for assessing musculoskeletal fitness, and the 4 × 10 m shuttle run and the one-leg-stance tests for assessing motor fitness, i.e. speed/agility and balance, respectively. The rationale for the selection of each of the tests included in the PREFIT battery is provided in this review, as well as directions for future research. LIMITATIONS: Levels of evidence based on quality assessment of selected studies could not be constructed due to the limited number of studies identified for each test.

conclusionsThe present systematic review has identified a need for further research on the validity of fitness tests in preschool children, as well as on their relationship with health. Due to this limited information, the PREFIT battery hereby proposed is based on the output of the current systematic review in preschool children, together with existing evidence in older children and adolescents. While we wait for more evidence to be accumulated in preschool children, the PREFIT battery hereby proposed is a useful tool for assessing physical fitness in children aged 3-5 years.

Indexed as

Physical FitnessCardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaChild, PreschoolExercise TestHand StrengthHumansMotor ActivityMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory Physiological Phenomena

Identifiers

PMID25370201
OpenAlexW2072415954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.