Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25369366›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A novel method to evaluate the community built environment using photographs--Environmental Profile of a Community Health (EPOCH) photo neighbourhood evaluation tool.

Clara K Chow, Daniel J Corsi, Karen Lock, Manisha Madhavan, Pam Mackie, Wei Li, Sun Yi, Yang Wang, Sumathi Swaminathan, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03225586 (Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03225586 recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology Study

TypeobservationalSponsorPopulation Health Research InstituteRan2002 to 2030Enrolled200,000ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Risk Factor, Cardiovascular, Health Behavior, Environmental Exposure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Urban Health Indicator Tools of the Physical Environment: a Systematic Review.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Clara K ChowPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; The George Institute for Global Health and Westmead Hospital Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Daniel J CorsiPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Harvard Center for Population & Development Studies, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Karen LockEuropean Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Manisha MadhavanPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Pam MackiePopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Wei LiCardiovascular Institute & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Sun YiCardiovascular Institute & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yang WangCardiovascular Institute & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Sumathi SwaminathanSt. John's Research Institute, St John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Patricio Lopez-JaramilloResearch Direction, Fundacion Oftalmologica de Santander-Clinica Carlos Arila Lulle and Medical School, Universidad de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Diego Gomez-ArbelaezResearch Direction, Fundacion Oftalmologica de Santander-Clinica Carlos Arila Lulle and Medical School, Universidad de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Álvaro AvezumDante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Scott A LearFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University and Division of Cardiology, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
Gilles DagenaisInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (Université Laval), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Koon TeoPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Martin McKeeEuropean Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Salim YusufPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Department of Health PDF/01/2008/031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research has shown that environments with features that encourage walking are associated with increased physical activity. Existing methods to assess the built environment using geographical information systems (GIS) data, direct audit or large surveys of the residents face constraints, such as data availability and comparability, when used to study communities in countries in diverse parts of the world. The aim of this study was to develop a method to evaluate features of the built environment of communities using a standard set of photos. In this report we describe the method of photo collection, photo analysis instrument development and inter-rater reliability of the instrument. METHODS/PRINCIPAL

findingsA minimum of 5 photos were taken per community in 86 communities in 5 countries according to a standard set of instructions from a designated central point of each community by researchers at each site. A standard pro forma derived from reviewing existing instruments to assess the built environment was developed and used to score the characteristics of each community. Photo sets from each community were assessed independently by three observers in the central research office according to the pro forma and the inter-rater reliability was compared by intra-class correlation (ICC). Overall 87% (53 of 60) items had an ICC of ≥ 0.70, 7% (4 of 60) had an ICC between 0.60 and 0.70 and 5% (3 of 60) items had an ICC ≤ 0.50. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Analysis of photos using a standardized protocol as described in this study offers a means to obtain reliable and reproducible information on the built environment in communities in very diverse locations around the world. The collection of the photographic data required minimal training and the analysis demonstrated high reliability for the majority of items of interest.

Indexed as

Public HealthEnvironment DesignHumansResidence CharacteristicsSocial EnvironmentSurveys and QuestionnairesWalking

Identifiers

PMID25369366
PMCPMC4219679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.