Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25369328›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Characterization of the CD14++CD16+ monocyte population in human bone marrow.

Manuela Mandl, Susanne Schmitz, Christian Weber, Michael Hristov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reduced Percentage of CD14International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Fractalkine/CX3CL1 in Neoplastic Processes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Crosstalk between substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide during heterotopic ossification in murine Achilles tendon.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manuela MandlInstitute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Susanne SchmitzInstitute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Christian WeberInstitute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany; Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
Michael HristovInstitute for Cardiovascular Prevention, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have divided blood monocytes according to their expression of the surface markers CD14 and CD16 into following subsets: classical CD14(++)CD16(-), intermediate CD14(++)CD16(+) and nonclassical CD14(+)CD16(++) monocytes. These subsets differ in phenotype and function and are further correlated to cardiovascular disease, inflammation and cancer. However, the CD14/CD16 nature of resident monocytes in human bone marrow remains largely unknown. In the present study, we identified a major population of CD14(++)CD16(+) monocytes by using cryopreserved bone marrow mononuclear cells from healthy donors. These cells express essential monocyte-related antigens and chemokine receptors such as CD11a, CD18, CD44, HLA-DR, Ccr2, Ccr5, Cx3cr1, Cxcr2 and Cxcr4. Notably, the expression of Ccr2 was inducible during culture. Furthermore, sorted CD14(++)CD16(+) bone marrow cells show typical macrophage morphology, phagocytic activity, angiogenic features and generation of intracellular oxygen species. Side-by-side comparison of the chemokine receptor profile with unpaired blood samples also demonstrated that these rather premature medullar monocytes mainly match the phenotype of intermediate and partially of (non)classical monocytes. Together, human monocytes obviously acquire their definitive CD14/CD16 signature in the bloodstream and the medullar monocytes probably transform into CD14(++)CD16- and CD14(+)CD16(++) subsets which appear enriched in the periphery.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow CellsCells, CulturedCryopreservationGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMacrophagesMonocytesReceptors, ChemokineReceptors, IgGFCGR3B protein, humanGPI-Linked ProteinsLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsReceptors, ChemokineReceptors, IgG

Identifiers

PMID25369328
PMCPMC4219836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.