ReviewNeural regeneration research2014
Extracellular matrices, artificial neural scaffolds and the promise of neural regeneration.
Review in Neural regeneration research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Region-specific brain decellularized extracellular matrix promotes cell recovery in an in vitro model of stroke.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A State-of-the-Art of Functional Scaffolds for 3D Nervous Tissue Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- A Bibliometric Review of Artificial Extracellular Matrices Based on Tissue Engineering Technology Literature: 1990 through 2019.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Potential of Chitosan and Its Derivatives for Biomedical Applications in the Central Nervous System.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Fibrous Materials Made of Poly(Polymers · 2019Article
- Current and novel polymeric biomaterials for neural tissue engineering.Journal of biomedical science · 2018Review
- Analyzing the role of extracellular matrix during nervous system development to advance new regenerative strategies.Neural regeneration research · 2017Article
- Injectable Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels as Scaffolds for Spinal Cord Injury Repair.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2016Article
- Facial nerve paralysis in children.World journal of clinical cases · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Over last 20 years, extracellular matrices have been shown to be useful in promoting tissue regeneration. Recently, they have been used and have had success in achieving neurogenesis. Recent developments in extracellular matrix design have allowed their successful in vivo incorporation to engender an environment favorable for neural regeneration in animal models. Promising treatments under investigation include manipulation of the intrinsic extracellular matrix and incorporation of engineered naometer-sized scaffolds through which inhibition of molecules serving as barriers to neuroregeneration and delivery of neurotrophic factors and/or cells for successful tissue regeneration can be achieved. Further understanding of the changes incurred within the extracellular matrix following central nervous system injury will undoubtedly help design a clinically efficacious extracellular matrix scaffold that can mitigate or reverse neural degeneration in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.