Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25368628›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2014

Using multi-locus allelic sequence data to estimate genetic divergence among four Lilium (Liliaceae) cultivars.

Arwa Shahin, Marinus J M Smulders, Jaap M van Tuyl, Paul Arens, Freek T Bakker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Fire Blight Susceptibility inFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biotechnological advances in Lilium.Plant cell reports · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arwa ShahinWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Marinus J M SmuldersWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Jaap M van TuylWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Paul ArensWageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, Netherlands.
Freek T BakkerBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) may enable estimating relationships among genotypes using allelic variation of multiple nuclear genes simultaneously. We explored the potential and caveats of this strategy in four genetically distant Lilium cultivars to estimate their genetic divergence from transcriptome sequences using three approaches: POFAD (Phylogeny of Organisms from Allelic Data, uses allelic information of sequence data), RAxML (Randomized Accelerated Maximum Likelihood, tree building based on concatenated consensus sequences) and Consensus Network (constructing a network summarizing among gene tree conflicts). Twenty six gene contigs were chosen based on the presence of orthologous sequences in all cultivars, seven of which also had an orthologous sequence in Tulipa, used as out-group. The three approaches generated the same topology. Although the resolution offered by these approaches is high, in this case there was no extra benefit in using allelic information. We conclude that these 26 genes can be widely applied to construct a species tree for the genus Lilium.

Indexed as

allelic variationConsensus Networkgenetic divergenceLiliumPOFADRAxMLTulipa

Identifiers

PMID25368628
PMCPMC4202788
OpenAlexW2031173336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.