Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25368618›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2014

From Monocytes to M1/M2 Macrophages: Phenotypical vs. Functional Differentiation.

Paola Italiani, Diana Boraschi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03173677 (Monocyte Differentiation and Macrophage Polarization in Circulation in Response to Macronutrient Intake in Healthy Humans), which is not on this map. Cited by 1,185 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,185citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03173677 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Monocyte Differentiation and Macrophage Polarization in Circulation in Response to Macronutrient Intake in Healthy Humans: A Randomized Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health SciencesRan2016 to 2016Enrolled36ConditionsAtherosclerosisArmsLipid Intake, Glucose intake, Protein intake
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,185 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. The role of IRF5 as an immune regulator.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Changes in leukocytes and CRP in different treatments of major depression.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  15. The M1/M2 Test System for Determining Macrophage Phenotypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paola ItalianiLaboratory of Innate Immunity and Cytokines, Institute of Protein Biochemistry, National Research Council , Napoli , Italy.
Diana BoraschiLaboratory of Innate Immunity and Cytokines, Institute of Protein Biochemistry, National Research Council , Napoli , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on monocyte and macrophage biology and differentiation have revealed the pleiotropic activities of these cells. Macrophages are tissue sentinels that maintain tissue integrity by eliminating/repairing damaged cells and matrices. In this M2-like mode, they can also promote tumor growth. Conversely, M1-like macrophages are key effector cells for the elimination of pathogens, virally infected, and cancer cells. Macrophage differentiation from monocytes occurs in the tissue in concomitance with the acquisition of a functional phenotype that depends on microenvironmental signals, thereby accounting for the many and apparently opposed macrophage functions. Many questions arise. When monocytes differentiate into macrophages in a tissue (concomitantly adopting a specific functional program, M1 or M2), do they all die during the inflammatory reaction, or do some of them survive? Do those that survive become quiescent tissue macrophages, able to react as naïve cells to a new challenge? Or, do monocyte-derived tissue macrophages conserve a "memory" of their past inflammatory activation? This review will address some of these important questions under the general framework of the role of monocytes and macrophages in the initiation, development, resolution, and chronicization of inflammation.

Indexed as

functional phenotypesinflammationmonocyte-derived macrophagesmonocytestissue-resident macrophages

Identifiers

PMID25368618
PMCPMC4201108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.