ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2014
Dissecting inhibitory brain circuits with genetically-targeted technologies.
Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic-review of olfactory deficits in neurodevelopmental disorders: From mouse to human.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Genetic and viral approaches to record or manipulate neurons in insects.Current opinion in insect science · 2021Review
- Inhibitory cell populations depend on age, sex, and prior experience across a neural network for Critical Period learning.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Developmental broadening of inhibitory sensory maps.Nature neuroscience · 2017Article
- The Influence of Regional Distribution and Pharmacologic Specificity of GABAFrontiers in systems neuroscience · 2017Review
- Somatostatin-IRES-Cre Mice: Between Knockout and Wild-Type?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2017Article
- Task Learning Promotes Plasticity of Interneuron Connectivity Maps in the Olfactory Bulb.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
- aMAP is a validated pipeline for registration and segmentation of high-resolution mouse brain data.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Neural circuits revealed.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evolution of genetically targeted tools has begun to allow us to dissect anatomically and functionally heterogeneous interneurons, and to probe circuit function from synapses to behavior. Over the last decade, these tools have been used widely to visualize neurons in a cell type-specific manner, and engage them to activate and inactivate with exquisite precision. In this process, we have expanded our understanding of interneuron diversity, their functional connectivity, and how selective inhibitory circuits contribute to behavior. Here we discuss the relative assets of genetically encoded fluorescent proteins (FPs), viral tracing methods, optogenetics, chemical genetics, and biosensors in the study of inhibitory interneurons and their respective circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.