Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25368515›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2014

Determinants of patient satisfaction with hospital health care in psychiatry: results based on the SATISPSY-22 questionnaire.

Xavier Y Zendjidjian, Pascal Auquier, Christophe Lançon, Anderson Loundou, Nathalie Parola, Melanie Faugère, Laurent Boyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Subjectively different but objectively the same? Three profiles of QoL in people with severe mental health problems.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xavier Y ZendjidjianAix-Marseille University, Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life, Research Unit, Marseille, France ; Department of Psychiatry, Inpatient Psychiatric Unit, La Conception University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Pascal AuquierAix-Marseille University, Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life, Research Unit, Marseille, France.
Christophe LançonAix-Marseille University, Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life, Research Unit, Marseille, France ; Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Public Sector 6, Sainte-Marguerite University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Anderson LoundouAix-Marseille University, Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life, Research Unit, Marseille, France.
Nathalie ParolaDepartment of Addictology, Day Hospital, Sainte-Marguerite University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Melanie FaugèreDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Public Sector 6, Sainte-Marguerite University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Laurent BoyerAix-Marseille University, Public Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life, Research Unit, Marseille, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of our study was to identify patient- and care-related factors that are associated with patients' satisfaction with psychiatric hospital care, using a specific, self-administered questionnaire based exclusively on the patient's point of view: the Satisfaction with Psychiatry Care Questionnaire-22 (SATISPSY-22).

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in the psychiatric departments of two French public university teaching hospitals. The data collected included sociodemographic information, clinical characteristics, care characteristics, and the SATISPSY-22. A multivariate analysis using multiple linear regressions was performed to determine the variables potentially associated with satisfaction levels.

resultsTwo hundred seventy patients were enrolled in our study. Only one moderate association was found between satisfaction and sociodemographic characteristics: the personal experience dimension with age (β=0.15). Clinical improvement was moderately associated with higher global satisfaction (β=-0.15), higher satisfaction with quality of care (β=-0.19), and higher satisfaction with food (β=-0.18). Stronger associations with satisfaction were found for care characteristics, particularly the therapeutic alliance with all of the satisfaction dimensions (β, 0.20-0.43) except food, and for seclusion with global satisfaction (β=-0.33) and personal experience (β=-0.32). Patients with previous hospitalization also had a higher level of satisfaction with quality of care compared with patients who were admitted for the first time (β=-0.15).

conclusionThis study has identified a number of potential determinants of satisfaction. The therapeutic relationship and seclusion were the most important features associated with a patient's satisfaction. These factors might be amenable through intervention, which, in turn, might be expected to improve satisfaction, patients' management, and health outcomes in psychiatric hospitals.

Indexed as

determinantshospitalinpatientpsychiatrysatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID25368515
PMCPMC4216022
OpenAlexW2093923681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.