Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25368509›Full record

ReviewCancer informatics2014

Network Analysis of Cancer-focused Association Network Reveals Distinct Network Association Patterns.

Yuji Zhang, Cui Tao

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuji ZhangDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. ; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Cui TaoSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND GREENEBAUM CANCER CENTERSUPPORT GRANTP30CA134274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FEYRUZ VIRGILIA RASSOOL · 2008 to 2026
$51.0M
Patient Medical History Representation, Extraction, and Inference from EHR DataR01LM011829 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TAO, CUI · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Onto-BioThesaurus: ontological representation of gene/protein names for biomedicaR01LM009959 · NLM · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG · 2009 to 2010
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA134274NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009959NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease. Genetic methods have uncovered thousands of complex tissue-specific mutation-induced effects and identified multiple disease gene targets. Important associations between cancer and other biological entities (eg, genes and drugs) in cancer network, however, are usually scattered in biomedical publications. Systematic analyses of these cancer-specific associations can help highlight the hidden associations between different cancer types and related genes/drugs. In this paper, we proposed a novel network-based computational framework to identify statistically over-expressed subnetwork patterns called network motifs (NMs) in an integrated cancer-specific drug-disease-gene network extracted from Semantic MEDLINE, a database containing extracted associations from MEDLINE abstracts. Eight significant NMs were identified and considered as the backbone of the cancer association network. Each NM corresponds to specific biological meanings. We demonstrated that such approaches will facilitate the formulization of novel cancer research hypotheses, which is critical for translational medicine research and personalized medicine in cancer.

Indexed as

cancerdrug-disease-gene networknetwork analysisnetwork motifsemantic MEDLINE

Identifiers

PMID25368509
PMCPMC4214591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.