ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2014
Three dysregulated microRNAs in serum as novel biomarkers for gastric cancer screening.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of microRNAs as potential biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer.Immunogenetics · 2021Pooled it
- Serum miR-16 as a potential biomarker for human cancer diagnosis: results from a large-scale population.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019Pooled it
- The diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs as a biomarker for gastric cancer: A meta‑analysis.Oncology reports · 2019Pooled it
- MicroRNAs as non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for gastric cancer: Current insights and future perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Pooled it
- Review
- Integrating Salivary Biomarkers CST4 andClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025Article
- Peripherical Blood hsa-miR-335-5p Quantification as a Prognostic, but Not Diagnostic, Marker of Gastric Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Non-Coding RNA as Biomarkers and Their Role in the Pathogenesis of Gastric Cancer-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- miR-100 rs1834306 a > G polymorphism decreases neuroblastoma risk in Chinese children.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Screening and validation of novel serum panel of microRNA in stratification of prostate cancer.Prostate international · 2023Article
- Improving the Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2021Review
- miR-223-5p Suppresses OTX1 to Mediate Malignant Progression of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- hsa-miR-100-5p, an overexpressed miRNA in human ovarian endometriotic stromal cells, promotes invasion through attenuation of SMARCD1 expression.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020Article
- Plasma exosome-encapsulated microRNA-21 and microRNA-92a are promising biomarkers for the prediction of peritoneal recurrence in patients with gastric cancer.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- MicroRNA Sequencing Reveals the Effect of Different Levels of Non-Fibrous Carbohydrate/Neutral Detergent Fiber on Rumen Development in Calves.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Plasma Level of MicroRNAs, MiR-107, MiR-194 and MiR-210 as Potential Biomarkers for Diagnosis Intestinal-Type Gastric Cancer in HumanAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Induction/reversal of drug resistance in gastric cancer by non-coding RNAs (Review).International journal of oncology · 2019Review
- miR-223-5p Suppresses Tumor Growth and Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Targeting E2F8.Oncology research · 2019Article
- Generation and Validation of miR-100 Hepatocyte-Specific Knock-Out Mice.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
- Droplet digital PCR-based circulating microRNA detection serve as a promising diagnostic method for gastric cancer.BMC cancer · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most threatening diseases. The symptoms of GC are complex and hard to detect, which also contribute to the poor prognosis of GC. Besides, the current diagnosis for GC is expensive and invasive. Thus, a fast, noninvasive biomarker is urgently needed for GC screening. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs, which are involved in a great variety of pathological processes, particularly carcinogenesis. MiRNAs are stable in gastric juice, plasma as well as serum, which facilitate it to be a promising biomarker for cancer. In this study, we selected three novel miRNAs, i.e., miR-233, miR-16, and miR-100, to investigate their potential diagnostic value in GC screening. A total of 50 GC patients and 47 healthy controls were involved in this study. Blood serum samples were collected; RNAs were extracted and normalized with U6 snRNA as the internal control; qRT-PCR was performed for relative expression of target miRNAs. Levels of miRNAs expression were compared by Student's t test for the comparison between two groups, and one-way ANOVA was used for multiple comparisons. The expression of miR-223, miR-16, and miR-100 was all significantly higher in GC patients than controls (all P < 0.001). All the tested miRNAs were manifested to be valuable biomarkers for GC. Relative expression of these miRNAs was significantly correlated with clinical characteristics of GC patients, such as TNM stage (P = 0.036 for miR-223; P < 0.001 for miR-100), metastatic status (P = 0.045 for miR-223; P = 0.031 for miR-16; P = 0.006 for miR-100), tumor size (P = 0.042 for miR-223; P = 0.031 for miR-16; P < 0.001 for miR-100), and differentiation grade (P = 0.036 for miR-223; P = 0.030 for miR-16; P = 0.034 for miR-100). However, in T classification, which considered both tumor size and direct extent of primary tumor, the difference in target miRNAs expression was not significant. In summary, we confirmed the diagnostic value of serum miR-223, miR-16, and miR-100 in GC. Significantly elevated expression of the three miRNAs was also observed in advanced GC patients, which suggested their availability in cancer staging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.