ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2015
Morbidity and mortality risk ratios are elevated in severe supine dominant OSA: a long-term follow-up study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research trends and hotspots regarding treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Standardized framework to report on the role of sleeping position in sleep apnea patients.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2021Review
- Assessment of Nocturnal Autonomic Cardiac Imbalance in Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A Multiscale Nonlinear Approach.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea in myasthenia gravis patients: a single center study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Phenotyping the pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea using polygraphy/polysomnography: a review of the literature.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2018Review
- Length of Individual Apnea Events Is Increased by Supine Position and Modulated by Severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Sleep disorders · 2016Article
- Pitfalls of AHI system of severity grading in obstructive sleep apnoea.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeObstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common public health problem. Sleeping position dependency has been related to OSA, and around half of OSA patients suffer from positional OSA where majority of the respiratory events occur in supine position. The consequences of supine dominant OSA have not been thoroughly investigated in long-term follow-up studies. The aim of the study was to retrospectively investigate the effects of supine dominant OSA on morbidity and mortality risk ratios during long-term follow-up and compare the findings with a non-supine OSA group at different OSA severities.
methodsAmbulatory polygraphic recordings of 793 patients with median follow-up time of 194.5 months were retrospectively analysed. The risk ratios of morbidity and mortality of supine dominant OSA and non-supine OSA patients were compared.
resultsSupine dominant OSA patients, having majority of the obstruction events occurring in supine position, showed higher mortality and morbidity risk ratios in severe OSA category than the non-supine OSA patients. In severe category, the observed risk ratios were statistically significant.
conclusionsThe increased risk ratios of mortality and morbidity found further emphasises that supine OSA might have more severe health consequences than non-positional OSA especially in severe OSA. Severe OSA occurring in supine position was shown to be more deleterious than non-supine OSA based on long-term mortality and morbidity evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25367548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.