ArticleDer Nervenarzt2014
[Check-ups and screening for young people: what is reasonable with respect to psychiatric disorders?].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSevere mental illnesses become manifested early in life. First episodes are suffered in young adulthood at the latest and early symptoms and signs are often already reported in childhood and adolescence. Therefore, it is exactly these adolescents and young adults who have to be reached to detect signs early.
objectivesIn this article the check-ups and screening procedures routinely offered for this target group as well as the role of groups of persons who accompany young people in a variety of contexts are illustrated. Potential extensions with elements and structures for the early recognition of severe mental illnesses are outlined.
resultsWith the integration of psychiatric peculiarities and drug consumption into the diagnostic battery of the first adolescence healthcare examination (Jugendgesundheitsuntersuchung J1), the often already established familiarity of young persons and the waiving of costs by the health insurances, the J1 seems to be well-suited to provide a rough screening for precursor stages and risk factors for the development of severe mental illnesses and for the detection of a suspected manifest mental disorder. The primary role of most persons working with young people is to be a contact partner and to help transferring the person to the adequate service. Several early recognition centers were founded in Germany to offer low-threshold contact services in the view of existing barriers to care for help-seeking young persons and to provide the complex diagnostics.
conclusionsThe adolescence healthcare examinations can be a useful element for early detection of mental disorders and damaging behavior if the utilization rate is high and actions taken in case of suspected beginning disorder/damaging behavior are evaluated. To date, screening instruments for psychiatric disorders should not be used in wide population classes without group-specific targets and without direct contact between therapists and patients. Already established preventive services and initiatives should be interlinked. The health effects of the actions have to be analyzed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25367230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.