Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25367130›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2014

Influences on participant reporting in the World Health Organisation drugs exposure pregnancy registry; a qualitative study.

Elizabeth N Allen, Melba Gomes, Lucy Yevoo, Omar Egesah, Christine Clerk, Josaphat Byamugisha, Anthony Mbonye, Edwin Were, Ushma Mehta, Lynn M Atuyambe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Incidence, determinants and outcomes of pregnancy-associated hepatitis B flares: A regional hospital-based cohort study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Elizabeth N AllenDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. elizabeth.allen@uct.ac.za.
Melba GomesWorld Health Organisation, 1211 Avenue Appia, Geneva, 27, Switzerland. gomesm@who.int.
Lucy YevooDodowa Health Research Centre, Dodowa, Ghana. lyevoo@gmail.com.
Omar EgesahDepartment of Anthropology, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya. omagesa@gmail.com.
Christine ClerkSchool of Public Health, University of Ghana, Dodowa, Ghana. caclerk@gmail.com.
Josaphat ByamugishaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. byamugisha2001@yahoo.com.
Anthony MbonyeMinistry of Health, Kampala, Uganda. vpadmn@infocom.co.ug.
Edwin WereDepartment of Reproductive Health, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya. eowere@gmail.com.
Ushma MehtaIndependent Pharmacovigilance Consultant, Cape Town, South Africa. ushmaza@yahoo.com.
Lynn M AtuyambeDepartment of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. atuyambe.lynn@gmail.com.
Makerere University · UGMoi University · KEDodowa Health Research Centre · GHMinistry of Health · UGRight to Care · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Ghana · GHWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organisation has designed a pregnancy registry to investigate the effect of maternal drug use on pregnancy outcomes in resource-limited settings. In this sentinel surveillance system, detailed health and drug use data are prospectively collected from the first antenatal clinic visit until delivery. Over and above other clinical records, the registry relies on accurate participant reports about the drugs they use. Qualitative methods were incorporated into a pilot registry study during 2010 and 2011 to examine barriers to women reporting these drugs and other exposures at antenatal clinics, and how they might be overcome.

methodsTwenty-seven focus group discussions were conducted in Ghana, Kenya and Uganda with a total of 208 women either enrolled in the registry or from its source communities. A question guide was designed to uncover the types of exposure data under- or inaccurately reported at antenatal clinics, the underlying reasons, and how women prefer to be asked questions. Transcripts were analysed thematically.

resultsWomen said it was important for them to report everything they had used during pregnancy. However, they expressed reservations about revealing their consumption of traditional, over-the-counter medicines and alcohol to antenatal staff because of anticipated negative reactions. Some enrolled participants' improved relationship with registry staff facilitated information sharing and the registry tools helped overcome problems with recall and naming of medicines. Decisions about where women sought care, which influenced medicines used and antenatal clinic attendance, were influenced by pressure within and outside of the formal healthcare system to conform to conflicting behaviours. Conversations also reflected women's responsibilities for producing a healthy baby.

conclusionsWomen in this study commonly take traditional medicines in pregnancy, and to a lesser extent over-the-counter medicines and alcohol. The World Health Organisation pregnancy registry shows potential to enhance their reporting of these substances at the antenatal clinic. However, more work is needed to find optimal techniques for eliciting accurate reports, especially where the detail of constituents may never be known. It will also be important to find ways of sustaining such drug exposure surveillance systems in busy antenatal clinics.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomePregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsGhanaGlobal HealthHumansKenyaMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsQualitative ResearchRegistries

Identifiers

PMID25367130
PMCPMC4229602
OpenAlexW2134183368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.