Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25367033›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2014

Pericellular proteolysis in cancer.

Lisa Sevenich, Johanna A Joyce

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa SevenichCancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, 10065, USA.
Johanna A JoyceCancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, 10065, USA johanna@joycelab.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

Variability of Cellular Responses to Growth Factors and Drugs During TumorgenesisU54CA148967 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SANDER, CHRIS · 2010 to 2014
$13.8M
Investigating and Targeting TAMs in the Glioma MicroenvironmentR01CA181355 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE · PI JOYCE, JOHANNA · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA148967NCI NIH HHS CA181355NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181355NCI NIH HHS U54 CA148967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pericellular proteases have long been associated with cancer invasion and metastasis due to their ability to degrade extracellular matrix components. Recent studies demonstrate that proteases also modulate tumor progression and metastasis through highly regulated and complex processes involving cleavage, processing, or shedding of cell adhesion molecules, growth factors, cytokines, and kinases. In this review, we address how cancer cells, together with their surrounding microenvironment, regulate pericellular proteolysis. We dissect the multitude of mechanisms by which pericellular proteases contribute to cancer progression and discuss how this knowledge can be integrated into therapeutic opportunities.

Indexed as

Enzyme ActivationEnzyme InhibitorsExosomesNeoplasmsPeptide HydrolasesProtein TransportProteolysisTumor MicroenvironmentEnzyme InhibitorsPeptide Hydrolasesinvasionmacrophagesmetastasismigrationproteasestumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID25367033
PMCPMC4215179
OpenAlexW2100638553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.