Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25367024›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2015

Post-stroke fatigue: a deficit in corticomotor excitability?

Annapoorna Kuppuswamy, Ella V Clark, Isobel F Turner, John C Rothwell, Nick S Ward

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for post-stroke fatigue.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annapoorna KuppuswamySobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK a.kuppuswamy@ucl.ac.uk.
Ella V ClarkSobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.
Isobel F TurnerSobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.
John C RothwellSobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.
Nick S WardSobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.
University College London · GBSobell House · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of post-stroke fatigue is poorly understood although it is thought to be a consequence of central nervous system pathophysiology. In this study we investigate the relationship between corticomotor excitability and self-reported non-exercise related fatigue in chronic stroke population. Seventy first-time non-depressed stroke survivors (60.36 ± 12.4 years, 20 females, 56.81 ± 63 months post-stroke) with minimal motor and cognitive impairment were included in the cross-sectional observational study. Fatigue was measured using two validated questionnaires: Fatigue Severity Scale 7 and Neurological Fatigue Index - Stroke. Perception of effort was measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale in an isometric biceps hold-task and was used as a secondary measure of fatigue. Neurophysiological measures of corticomotor excitability were performed using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Corticospinal excitability was quantified using resting and active motor thresholds and stimulus-response curves of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Intracortical M1 excitability was measured using paired pulse paradigms: short and long interval intracortical inhibition in the same hand muscle as above. Excitability of cortical and subcortical inputs that drive M1 output was measured in the biceps muscle using a modified twitch interpolation technique to provide an index of central activation failure. Stepwise regression was performed to determine the explanatory variables that significantly accounted for variance in the fatigue and perception scores. Resting motor threshold (R = 0.384; 95% confidence interval = 0.071; P = 0.036) accounted for 14.7% (R(2)) of the variation in Fatigue Severity Scale 7. Central activation failure (R = 0.416; 95% confidence interval = -1.618; P = 0.003) accounted for 17.3% (R(2)) of the variation in perceived effort score. Thus chronic stroke survivors with high fatigue exhibit high motor thresholds and those who perceive high effort have low excitability of inputs that drive motor cortex output. We suggest that low excitability of both corticospinal output and its facilitatory synaptic inputs from cortical and sub-cortical sites contribute to high levels of fatigue after stroke.

Indexed as

AgedCognition DisordersCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEvoked Potentials, MotorFatigueFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexNeural InhibitionPerceptionPyramidal TractsStrokebehavioural neurologymotor cortexmotor evoked potentialsstroke rehabilitationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID25367024
PMCPMC4441078
OpenAlexW2021799193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.