Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25366987›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2016

Safety and optimal protocol of provocation test for diagnosis of multivessel coronary spasm.

Shozo Sueda, Toru Miyoshi, Yasuhiro Sasaki, Tomoki Sakaue, Hirokazu Habara, Hiroaki Kohno

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shozo SuedaDepartment of Cardiology, Ehime Niihama Prefectural Hospital, Hongou 3 choume 1-1, Niihama, Ehime, 792-0042, Japan. EZF03146@nifty.com.
Toru MiyoshiDepartment of Cardiology, Ehime Niihama Prefectural Hospital, Hongou 3 choume 1-1, Niihama, Ehime, 792-0042, Japan.
Yasuhiro SasakiDepartment of Cardiology, Ehime Niihama Prefectural Hospital, Hongou 3 choume 1-1, Niihama, Ehime, 792-0042, Japan.
Tomoki SakaueDepartment of Cardiology, Ehime Niihama Prefectural Hospital, Hongou 3 choume 1-1, Niihama, Ehime, 792-0042, Japan.
Hirokazu HabaraDepartment of Cardiology, Ehime Niihama Prefectural Hospital, Hongou 3 choume 1-1, Niihama, Ehime, 792-0042, Japan.
Hiroaki KohnoDepartment of Cardiology, Ehime Niihama Prefectural Hospital, Hongou 3 choume 1-1, Niihama, Ehime, 792-0042, Japan.
National Institute of Technology, Niihama College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the safety of acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER) tests retrospectively and investigated the optimal protocol of provocation test for diagnosis of multivessel coronary spasm. We performed 1546 ACh tests and 1114 ER tests during 23 years. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/80 μg into the right coronary artery (RCA) and of 20/50/100/200 μg into the left coronary artery (LCA) over 20 s. ER was administered in total doses of 40 μg into the RCA and of 64 μg into the LCA over 2-4 min. When a coronary spasm was induced and did not resolve spontaneously within 3 min after the completion of ACh/ER injection, or when hemodynamic instability due to coronary spasms occurred, 2.5-5.0 mg of nitrate was administered into the responsible vessel. To relive provoked spasm, it is necessary to administer nitrate in 31 cases by ACh and in 76 cases by ER (2.0 vs. 6.8 %, p < 0.01) before another vessel attempts. Multivessel spasms were often observed in LCA testing than in RCA testing on both agents [ACh: 78.6 % (11/14) vs. 11.8 % (2/17), p < 0.001, ER: 37.8 % (14/37) vs. 20.5 % (8/39), ns]. Even after the administration of nitrates, positive coronary spasm was obtained in 21.1 % by ACh and 52.9 % by ER tests on another coronary artery. No irreversible complications were recognized on both tests. We should firstly perform spasm provocation tests in the LCA and we may be able to diagnose another vessel spasm by performing the complete spasm provocation tests after the administration of nitrates to relieve provoked spasm in the first attempt.

Indexed as

VasoconstrictionAcetylcholineAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary VasospasmCoronary VesselsErgonovineFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArterialMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaPatient SafetyPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesAcetylcholineErgonovineVasoconstrictor AgentsVasodilator AgentsAcetylcholineErgonovineNitrateSpasm relief

Identifiers

PMID25366987
OpenAlexW2071278550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.