Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25366931›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2015

Effects of the communities that care prevention system on youth reports of protective factors.

B K Elizabeth Kim, Kari M Gloppen, Isaac C Rhew, Sabrina Oesterle, J David Hawkins

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01088542 (The Interplay of Social, Normative, and Legal Marijuana Environments and Marijuana and ATOD Use From Late Childhood to Young Adulthood), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01088542 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Interplay of Social, Normative, and Legal Marijuana Environments and Marijuana and ATOD Use From Late Childhood to Young Adulthood

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2003 to 2025Enrolled52,323ConditionsSubstance Abuse, Juvenile Delinquency, Sexual Behavior, Criminal BehaviorArmsCommunities That Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Pivotal Role of Prevention Science in This Syndemic.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Assessing Sustained Effects ofJournal of the Society for Social Work and Research · 2015
    Article
  13. Change in Protective Factors Across Adolescent Development.Journal of applied developmental psychology
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B K Elizabeth KimSocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 3rd Ave NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA, bethbk@uw.edu.
Kari M Gloppen
Isaac C Rhew
Sabrina Oesterle
J David Hawkins

Funding

The Community Youth Development Study: A Test of Communities That CareR01DA015183 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HAWKINS, J DAVID, OESTERLE, SABRINA · 2003 to 2016
$34.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many interventions seeking to reduce problem behaviors and promote healthy youth development target both risk and protective factors, yet few studies have examined the effect of preventive interventions on overall levels of protection community wide. In a community-randomized controlled trial, this study tested the effect of Communities That Care (CTC) on protective factors in 24 communities across seven states. Data on protective factors were collected from a panel of 4407 youths in CTC and control communities followed from grade 5 through grade 8. Hierarchical linear modeling compared mean levels of 15 protective factors derived from the social development model in CTC and control communities in grade 8, adjusted for individual and community characteristics and baseline levels of protective factors in grade 5. Global test statistics were calculated to examine effects on protection overall and by domain. Analyses across all protective factors found significantly higher levels of overall protection in CTC compared to control communities. Analyses by domain found significantly higher levels of protection in CTC than control communities in the community, school, and peer/individual domains, but not in the family domain. Significantly higher levels of opportunities for prosocial involvement in the community, recognition for prosocial involvement in school, interaction with prosocial peers, and social skills among CTC compared to control youth contributed to the overall and domain-specific results. This is consistent with CTC's theory of change, which posits that strengthening protective factors is a mechanism through which CTC prevents behavior problems.

Indexed as

Protective FactorsSocial ChangeAdolescentChildCommunity NetworksFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHumansJuvenile DelinquencyLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleProblem BehaviorRisk FactorsSocial BehaviorSocial Environment

Identifiers

PMID25366931
PMCPMC4418962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.