Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25366889›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2015

Strategic approaches to optimizing peptide ADME properties.

Li Di

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 280 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
280citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

280 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Virtual screening and experimental validation of a METTL3-targeting peptide withJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advances in Cyclic Peptides Targeting G Protein-Coupled Receptors.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Self-Assembling Short Peptide Carriers for Gene Delivery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

220 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Li DiPharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, 06340, USA, li.di@pfizer.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of peptide drugs is challenging but also quite rewarding. Five blockbuster peptide drugs are currently on the market, and six new peptides received first marketing approval as new molecular entities in 2012. Although peptides only represent 2% of the drug market, the market is growing twice as quickly and might soon occupy a larger niche. Natural peptides typically have poor absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties with rapid clearance, short half-life, low permeability, and sometimes low solubility. Strategies have been developed to improve peptide drugability through enhancing permeability, reducing proteolysis and renal clearance, and prolonging half-life. In vivo, in vitro, and in silico tools are available to evaluate ADME properties of peptides, and structural modification strategies are in place to improve peptide developability.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug DesignAnimalsComputer SimulationHalf-LifeHumansPeptidesPermeabilitySolubilityPeptides

Identifiers

PMID25366889
PMCPMC4287298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.