Trial reportMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2014
[Saving lives with dispatcher-assisted resuscitation: importance of effective telephone instruction].
Trial report in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recovery and stress of control center dispatchers in the first waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurvival rates after sudden cardiac arrest could be increased if bystanders could be encouraged to perform CPR until emergency services arrive. This should be initiated by the dispatcher at the emergency control facility who receives the call. For the first time the ERC guidelines of 2010 included instructions to be given to untrained rescuers by the dispatcher. Rapid recognition of cardiac arrest and initiation of emergency measures is assured by means of specific training for the dispatchers.
aimThe aim of this investigation was to determine whether the time between an emergency call and beginning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) could be shortened using a simple protocol and whether a relationship exists between the intensity of phone contact between dispatcher and caller and if this improves the results. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn known cases of unconsciousness, group 1 (45 persons) received short CPR instructions via the phone, where the dispatcher was on the phone for continuous advice until emergency services arrived. Group 2 (45 persons) received identical phone instructions like group 1, but the phone call was terminated by the dispatcher after the information was provided. Group 3 (29 persons) only received instructions to start CPR.
resultsOn average, all test persons in group 1 started reanimation after 68.0 ± 33.5 s, in group 2 after 68.3 ± 25.2 s, and in group 3 after 64.9 ± 34.4 s. The compression frequency on average was 98.3/min in group 1, 84.8/min in group 2, and 85.2/min in group 3; therefore, all groups reached an average frequency of > 80/min. The correct compression depth was achieved by 47.8 % of test persons in group 1, by 44.2 % in group 2, and by 30.2 % in group 3. All volunteers felt well supported. Of the 90 people, 70 did not feel that they were missing instructions. DISCUSSION: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the target variables. The results show that already extremely short instructions or advice by the dispatcher to start CPR is sufficient to encourage bystanders to give assistance in an emergency. Continuous support over the phone does not appear to be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25366886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.