ReviewIrish journal of medical science2015
A review of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanoma.
Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Is it Necessary to Perform Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma? A Retrospective Single Center Analysis.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020Article
- Survival analysis and sentinel lymph node status in thin cutaneous melanoma: A multicenter observational study.Cancer medicine · 2019Observational
- Reply: The significance of regression in thin melanoma of the skin.Irish journal of medical science · 2018Article
- Clinical utilities and biological characteristics of melanoma sentinel lymph nodes.World journal of clinical oncology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough there is a lack of established survival benefit of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), this technique has been increasingly applied in the staging of patients with thin (≤1.00 mm) melanoma (T1Nx), without clear supportive evidence.
methodsWe review the guidelines and available literature on the indications and rationale for performing SLNB in thin melanoma.
resultsAs a consequence of the paucity of evidence of SLNB in thin melanoma, there is considerable variability in the guidelines. It is difficult to define clinicopathologic factors that reliably predict the presence of nodal metastasis. SLNB does not yet inform management in thin melanoma to improve survival outcome.
conclusionBased on available evidence, high risk patients with melanomas between 0.75 and 1.00 mm may be appropriate candidates to be considered for SLN biopsy after discussing the likelihood of finding evidence of nodal progression, the risks of sentinel node biopsy, and the lack of proven survival benefit from any form of surgical nodal staging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25366817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.