Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25366816›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2016

Online patient safety education programme for junior doctors: is it worthwhile?

S E McCarthy, C A O'Boyle, A O'Shaughnessy, G Walsh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Preparing Medical Students and Physicians to Cope With Their Medical Errors: A Scoping Review.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. The COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis and Patient Safety Culture: A Mixed-Method Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Development and Effectiveness of a Patient Safety Education Program for Inpatients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Online-learning: exploring practices among Foundation doctors.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S E McCarthyInstitute of Leadership, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Reservoir House, Ballymoss Road, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland. smccarthy@rcsi.ie.
C A O'BoyleInstitute of Leadership, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Reservoir House, Ballymoss Road, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland.
A O'ShaughnessyEducation and Professional Development Department, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Frederick House, 19 South Frederick Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
G WalshEducation and Professional Development Department, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, Frederick House, 19 South Frederick Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing demand exists for blended approaches to the development of professionalism. Trainees of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland participated in an online patient safety programme.

aimsStudy aims were: (1) to determine whether the programme improved junior doctors' knowledge, attitudes and skills relating to error reporting, open communication and care for the second victim and (2) to establish whether the methodology facilitated participants' learning.

methods208 junior doctors who completed the programme completed a pre-online questionnaire. Measures were "patient safety knowledge and attitudes", "medical safety climate" and "experience of learning". Sixty-two completed the post-questionnaire, representing a 30 % matched response rate.

resultsParticipating in the programme resulted in immediate (p < 0.01) improvement in skills such as knowing when and how to complete incident forms and disclosing errors to patients, in self-rated knowledge (p < 0.01) and attitudes towards error reporting (p < 0.01). Sixty-three per cent disagreed that doctors routinely report medical errors and 42 % disagreed that doctors routinely share information about medical errors and what caused them. Participants rated interactive features as the most positive elements of the programme.

conclusionsAn online training programme on medical error improved self-rated knowledge, attitudes and skills in junior doctors and was deemed an effective learning tool. Perceptions of work issues such as a poor culture of error reporting among doctors may prevent improved attitudes being realised in practice. Online patient safety education has a role in practice-based initiatives aimed at developing professionalism and improving safety.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCommunicationFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMedical Staff, HospitalMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultE-learningJunior doctorsPatient safetyProfessionalismSurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.