Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25366718›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2014

Trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a German level-1 trauma center.

Wolfgang Parsch, Markus Loibl, Uli Schmucker, Franz Hilber, Michael Nerlich, Antonio Ernstberger

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wolfgang ParschDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany. wolfgang@tuok.de.
Markus LoiblDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany. markus.loibl@ukr.de.
Uli SchmuckerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany. uli.schmucker@auc-online.de.
Franz HilberDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany. franz.hilber@ukr.de.
Michael NerlichDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany. michael.nerlich@ukr.de.
Antonio ErnstbergerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany. toni.ernstberger@ukr.de.
University Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal care of multiple trauma patients has to be at a high level around the clock. Trauma care algorithms and guidelines are available, yet it remains unclear if the time of admission to the trauma room affects the quality of care and outcomes. Hence the present study intends to compare the quality of trauma room care of multiple severely injured patients at a level-1 trauma center depending on the time of admission.

methodsA total of 394 multiple trauma patients with an ISS ≥ 16 were included into this study (observation period: 52 months). Patients were grouped by the time and date of their admission to the trauma room [business hours (BH): weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. vs. non-business hours (NBH): outside BH]. The study analysed differences in patient demographics, trauma room treatment and outcome.

resultsThe study sample was comparable in all basic characteristics [mean ISS: 32.3 ± 14.3 (BH) vs. 32.6 ± 14.4 (NBH), p = 0.853; mean age: 40.8 ± 21.0 (BH) vs. 37.7 ± 20.2 years (NBH), p = 0.278]. Similar values were found for the time needed for single interventions, like arterial access [4.8 ± 3.9 min (BH) vs. 4.9 ± 3.4 min (NBH), p = 0.496] and quality-assessment parameters, like time until CT [28.5 ± 18.7 min (BH), vs. 27.3 ± 9.5) min (NBH), p = 0.637]. There was no difference for the 24 h mortality and overall hospital mortality in BH and NBH, with 13.5% vs. 9.1% (p = 0.206) and, 21.9% vs. 15.4% (p = 0.144), respectively. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) comparison revealed no difference [3.7 ± 1.6 (BH) vs. 3.9 ± 1.5 (NBH), p = 0.305]. In general, the observed demographic, injury severity, care quality and outcome parameters revealed no significant difference between the two time periods BH and NBH.

conclusionsThe study hospital provides multiple trauma patient care at comparable quality irrespective of time of admission to the trauma room. These results might be attributable to the standardization of the treatment process using established principles, algorithms and guidelines as well as to the resources available in a level-1 trauma center.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleGermanyGlasgow Outcome ScaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMultiple TraumaQuality Assurance, Health CareRetrospective StudiesTrauma CentersWorkload

Identifiers

PMID25366718
PMCPMC4229611
OpenAlexW2139698902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.