Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25366714›Full record

Trial reportClinical neuroradiology2016

First-In-Man Procedural Experience with the Novel EmboTrap® Revascularization Device for the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke-A European Multicenter Series.

C Kabbasch, A Mpotsaris, T Liebig, M Söderman, M Holtmannspötter, M Cronqvist, J Thornton, V Mendes Pereira, T Andersson

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Early results with EmboTrap III stent retriever: A multicenter US experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  3. The initial experience with the Embotrap III stent-retriever in a real world setting.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Stentrievers : An engineering review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Favorable first-pass recanalization rates with NeVa™ thrombectomy device in acute stroke patients: Initial clinical experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Initial experience with the novel EmboTrap II clot-retrieving device for the treatment of ischaemic stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

C KabbaschDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
A MpotsarisDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. anastasios.mpotsaris@uk-koeln.de.
T LiebigDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
M SödermanDepartment of Neurointervention, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
M HoltmannspötterDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
M CronqvistDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J ThorntonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, 9, Dublin, Ireland.
V Mendes PereiraInterventional Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva, Switzerland.
T AnderssonDepartment of Neurointervention, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
University Hospital Cologne · DEKarolinska University Hospital · SERigshospitalet · DKBeaumont Hospital · IEUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe describe safety and efficacy aspects of mechanical thrombectomy with the novel stent-type clot retrieval device EmboTrap for revascularization of large-artery occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 40 patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-artery occlusion were treated in five European centers. Clinical and procedural data were collected; self-reported angiographic results and neurologic outcome (discharge and 90 days) were assessed in a standardized manner.

resultsThe median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at admittance was 16; no patient was treated after 12 h. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was received by 65 % of patients. The territorial distribution was as follows: 87.5 % in the anterior circulation: 62.5 % middle cerebral artery and 25 % internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus, comprising 20 % tandem occlusions; and 12.5 % in the posterior circulation, all of which were vertebrobasilar. Revascularization of TICI 2b-3 was achieved in 38 of 40 (95 %) treatments. Additional devices were utilized in 11 of 40 (28 %) cases after a mean of 2.6 passes with EmboTrap prior to switching. The mean number of EmboTrap passes needed was 1.8, with a mean procedural time to reperfusion of 54 min. One patient (2.5 %), who had not received IVT, experienced symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage post-interventionally. Procedural complications were encountered in 2 of 40 cases (5 %); both patients exhibited ICA dissection that was treated conservatively without clinical sequelae. There were no device-related complications. Of 23 available patients, 8 (35 %) had a good outcome after 90 days.

conclusionThe procedural results from these five centers suggest that EmboTrap is technically safe. Successful recanalization rates can be expected to be within the range of other stent retrievers.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageCerebral RevascularizationEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMechanical ThrombolysisPilot ProjectsRadiography, InterventionalStrokeTreatment OutcomeEmboTrapIschemic strokeMechanical thrombectomyRecanalizationSolitaireStent retrieverStentrieverTrevo

Identifiers

PMID25366714
OpenAlexW2044864252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.