Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25366372›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2014

[Neuroendocrine tumors of the lungs. From small cell lung carcinoma to diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia].

P A Schnabel, K Junker

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Neuroendocrine tumors].Der Pathologe · 2015
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P A SchnabelInstitut für Allgemeine und Spezielle Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Gebäude 26, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland, Philipp.Schnabel@uks.eu.
K Junker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new World Health Organization (WHO) classification announced for 2015 will for the first time present all neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the lungs in one single section. In this classification high grade small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) will be discriminated from intermediate grade atypical carcinoid (AC) and low grade typical carcinoid as well as from the preinvasive lesion diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH). The LCNEC was previously listed under the section of large cell carcinomas. The LCNEC could previously be diagnosed according to the current WHO classification from 2004 which is designed for resection specimens. According to this the main diagnostic criteria are a neuroendocrine growth pattern which can be difficult or impossible to detect in biopsy material, non-small cell cytological features, more than 10 mitoses per 2 mm(2) (mean 70-80 per 2 mm(2)), tumor cell necrosis, and an immunohistochemical positivity for at least one neuroendocrine marker other than neuron-specific enolase (NSE). The presentation of all neuroendocrine tumors of the lungs in one section allows a more direct comparison and a better differential diagnostic discrimination of the different entities.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Small CellHumansHyperplasiaLungLung NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine CellsNeuroendocrine Tumors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.