Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25366353›Full record

ReviewSurgery today2015

Gastric adenocarcinoma with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a borderline resectable cancer?

Yasuhiro Kodera, Daisuke Kobayashi, Chie Tanaka, Michitaka Fujiwara

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgery today, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Surgery Matters: Progress in Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Significance of nodal dissection and nodal positivity in gastric cancer.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Recent Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The long-term survival of stage IV gastric cancer patients with conversion therapy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Is conversion therapy possible in stage IV gastric cancer: the proposal of new biological categories of classification.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2016
    Review
  19. Gastric cancer: Current status of lymph node dissection.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
  20. Conversion therapy for stage IV gastric cancer-the present and future.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasuhiro KoderaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan, ykodera@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Daisuke Kobayashi
Chie Tanaka
Michitaka Fujiwara
Nagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dissection of the para-aortic lymph nodes (PAN) had once been enthusiastically explored at dedicated centers throughout Japan. Reflecting the results of a randomized trial, however, the current standard surgery for advanced resectable gastric cancer does not include systematic dissection of the PAN. Gastric cancer with PAN metastases, currently considered distant metastases, is classified as Stage IV, and according to the algorithm of the Japanese guidelines, is not indicated for surgery with curative intent. Historical data indicates, however, that a certain proportion of long-term survivors can be introduced among patients with PAN metastasis through D2 + PAN dissection. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group launched a series of phase II trials exploring a strategy employing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by D2 + PAN dissection for patients radiologically diagnosed to harbor metastases to the PAN. The campaign was successful, with 57% of these patients surviving for 5 years after two cycles of neoadjuvant S-1/CDDP followed by surgery. This strategy is now the tentative standard, mentioned in the 4th version of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines as one of the current clinical questions, and could be replaced by a more powerful combination chemotherapy or treatment employing more or longer cycles of chemotherapy in the future. The relevance of the strategy consisting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by D2 + PAN dissection and its fundamental difference from the concept of conversion therapy are discussed herein with reference to the literature.

Indexed as

Lymph NodesAdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAortaCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyDrug CombinationsGastrectomyHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionNeoadjuvant TherapyOxonic AcidStomach NeoplasmsTegafurCisplatinDrug CombinationsOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)Tegafur

Identifiers

PMID25366353
OpenAlexW2094699433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.