ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2015
MicroRNAs used as novel biomarkers for detecting cancer metastasis.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNA Profiles Distinguishing Metastatic from Non-Metastatic Salivary Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Combination of RET, BRAF and Demographic Data Identifies Subsets of Patients with Aggressive Papillary Thyroid Cancer.Hormones & cancer · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The low survival rates of cancers are primarily due to late diagnosis and metastasis. Discriminating the metastasis is a crucial factor for prognosis and improving the survival rate of cancer patients. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) can regulate the expression of hundreds of downstream genes, which has a broad effect on the regulation of the whole cell cycle. Accumulating studies have found that the aberrant expression of miRNAs is associated with cancer genesis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of miRNAs in detecting cancer metastasis. Medline, PubMed, Embase, and CNKI were searched for relevant articles. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR, NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve and the calculated AUC (area under the SROC curve) were applied to explore the diagnostic accuracy of miRNAs in metastasis. Seven hundred seventy-one metastatic cancer patients and 552 non-metastatic cancer controls from 14 articles were involved in our meta-analysis. A sensitivity of 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.79) and a specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.84) were observed from metastatic patients and non-metastatic controls in the combined analysis. And the AUC was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.86). In addition, results from subgroup analyses suggested that a higher diagnostic value for metastasis was acquired in tissue sample other than blood sample (sensitivity, 0.82 versus 0.73; specificity, 0.84 versus 0.79; PLR, 5.0 versus 3.5; NLR, 0.22 versus 0.34; DOR, 23 versus 10; AUC, 0.88 versus 0.80). In summary, this meta-analysis proved the relatively high diagnostic value of miRNA in metastasis, which might be applied as a novel screening tool to detect metastasis along with other biomarkers. We also illustrated that tissue-based miRNAs may have a better diagnostic accuracy than blood-based miRNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.