Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25365763›Full record

ReviewPsychological bulletin2015

Interoceptive dysfunction: toward an integrated framework for understanding somatic and affective disturbance in depression.

Christopher Harshaw

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 292 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Neural correlates of heart-focused interoception: a functional magnetic resonance imaging meta-analysis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate Increases Resting-State Limbic Perfusion and Body and Emotion Awareness in Humans.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The cognitive and motor determinants of the perception of effort.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher HarshawIndiana University.ORCID 0000-0002-1400-7356
Indiana University · US

Funding

Ontogeny of sociality in a mouse modelR01MH082019 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERTS, JEFFREY R · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082019NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH082019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is characterized by disturbed sleep and eating, a variety of other nonspecific somatic symptoms, and significant somatic comorbidities. Why there is such close association between cognitive and somatic dysfunction in depression is nonetheless poorly understood. An explosion of research in the area of interoception-the perception and interpretation of bodily signals-over the last decade nonetheless holds promise for illuminating what have until now been obscure links between the social, cognitive-affective, and somatic features of depression. This article reviews rapidly accumulating evidence that both somatic signaling and interoception are frequently altered in depression. This includes comparative studies showing vagus-mediated effects on depression-like behaviors in rodent models as well as studies in humans indicating both dysfunction in the neural substrates for interoception (e.g., vagus, insula, anterior cingulate cortex) and reduced sensitivity to bodily stimuli in depression. An integrative framework for organizing and interpreting this evidence is put forward which incorporates (a) multiple potential pathways to interoceptive dysfunction; (b) interaction with individual, gender, and cultural differences in interoception; and (c) a developmental psychobiological systems perspective, emphasizing likely differential susceptibility to somatic and interoceptive dysfunction across the lifespan. Combined with current theory and evidence, it is suggested that core symptoms of depression (e.g., anhedonia, social deficits) may be products of disturbed interoceptive-exteroceptive integration. More research is nonetheless needed to fully elucidate the relationship between mind, body, and social context in depression.

Indexed as

AnimalsDepressionDepressive DisorderHumansInteroceptionMood DisordersPsychophysiology

Identifiers

PMID25365763
PMCPMC4346391
OpenAlexW2091340414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.