Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25365139›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2015

Autoantibody signature for the serologic detection of ovarian cancer.

Karen S Anderson, Daniel W Cramer, Sahar Sibani, Garrick Wallstrom, Jessica Wong, Jin Park, Ji Qiu, Allison Vitonis, Joshua LaBaer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Serum Lipidome Profiling Reveals a Distinct Signature of Ovarian Cancer in Korean Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karen S AndersonCenter for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona 85287-6401, United States.
Daniel W Cramer
Sahar Sibani
Garrick Wallstrom
Jessica Wong
Jin Park
Ji Qiu
Allison Vitonis
Joshua LaBaer
Arizona State University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

PROTEOMIC/EPIDMIOLOGIC PATHS TO OVARIAN CANCER SCREENINGU01CA086381 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CRAMER, DANIEL WILLIAM · 2000 to 2010
$9.0M
Biomarker Detection Using NAPPA Tumor Antigen ArraysU01CA117374 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ANDERSON, KAREN SUE, LABAER, JOSHUA · 2005 to 2015
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA086381NCI NIH HHS U01 CA117374NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA086381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sera from patients with ovarian cancer contain autoantibodies (AAb) to tumor-derived proteins that are potential biomarkers for early detection. To detect AAb, we probed high-density programmable protein microarrays (NAPPA) expressing 5177 candidate tumor antigens with sera from patients with serous ovarian cancer (n = 34 cases/30 controls) and measured bound IgG. Of these, 741 antigens were selected and probed with an independent set of ovarian cancer sera (n = 60 cases/60 controls). Twelve potential autoantigens were identified with sensitivities ranging from 13 to 22% at >93% specificity. These were retested using a Luminex bead array using 60 cases and 60 controls, with sensitivities ranging from 0 to 31.7% at 95% specificity. Three AAb (p53, PTPRA, and PTGFR) had area under the curve (AUC) levels >60% (p < 0.01), with the partial AUC (SPAUC) over 5 times greater than for a nondiscriminating test (p < 0.01). Using a panel of the top three AAb (p53, PTPRA, and PTGFR), if at least two AAb were positive, then the sensitivity was 23.3% at 98.3% specificity. AAb to at least one of these top three antigens were also detected in 7/20 sera (35%) of patients with low CA 125 levels and 0/15 controls. AAb to p53, PTPRA, and PTGFR are potential biomarkers for the early detection of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansImmunoglobulin GOvarian NeoplasmsProtein Array AnalysisProteomicsRegression AnalysisSensitivity and SpecificityAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorImmunoglobulin GautoantibodiesbiomarkerOvarian cancerprotein microarraysproteomics

Identifiers

PMID25365139
PMCPMC4334299
OpenAlexW1979004604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.