Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25365133›Full record

Trial reportJournal of athletic training2015

Strengthening of the hip and core versus knee muscles for the treatment of patellofemoral pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Reed Ferber, Lori Bolgla, Jennifer E Earl-Boehm, Carolyn Emery, Karrie Hamstra-Wright

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of athletic training, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02441712 nacompletednot on this map

Supervised Rehabilitation With Patterned Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulation for Patients With Patellofemoral Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2015 to 2017Enrolled21ConditionsPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeArmsPENS
NCT03513094 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Volitional Transversus Abdominis Contraction on Time to Peak Sagittal Ground Reaction Force in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center ShreveportRan2017 to 2017Enrolled5ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsTransversus Abdominis Contraction
NCT03776981 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Core Activation and Stabilization Training on Gait Kinetics, Kinematics, and Speed, and Self-Perceived Function in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center ShreveportRan2019 to 2019Enrolled44ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsCore Activation, Core Stabilization
NCT04503304 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Hip Abductors Versus Knee Extensor Strengthening on Pain,Function and Quadriceps Isometric Strength in Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled70ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsExercises
NCT05351814 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect Of Core Stabilization Exercises In Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstinye UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeArmsExercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Risk Associated with Squats: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Impact of Pilates mat-based exercises on knee kinematics during running.Journal of bodywork and movement therapies · 2023
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reed FerberFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Lori Bolgla
Jennifer E Earl-Boehm
Carolyn Emery
Karrie Hamstra-Wright

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPatellofemoral pain (PFP) is the most common injury in running and jumping athletes. Randomized controlled trials suggest that incorporating hip and core strengthening (HIP) with knee-focused rehabilitation (KNEE) improves PFP outcomes. However, no randomized controlled trials have, to our knowledge, directly compared HIP and KNEE programs.

objectiveTo compare PFP pain, function, hip- and knee-muscle strength, and core endurance between KNEE and HIP protocols after 6 weeks of rehabilitation. We hypothesized greater improvements in (1) pain and function, (2) hip strength and core endurance for patients with PFP involved in the HIP protocol, and (3) knee strength for patients involved in the KNEE protocol.

designRandomized controlled clinical trial.

settingFour clinical research laboratories in Calgary, Alberta; Chicago, Illinois; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and Augusta, Georgia. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsOf 721 patients with PFP screened, 199 (27.6%) met the inclusion criteria (66 men [31.2%], 133 women [66.8%], age = 29.0 ± 7.1 years, height = 170.4 ± 9.4 cm, weight = 67.6 ± 13.5 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Patients with PFP were randomly assigned to a 6-week KNEE or HIP protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary variables were self-reported visual analog scale and Anterior Knee Pain Scale measures, which were conducted weekly. Secondary variables were muscle strength and core endurance measured at baseline and at 6 weeks.

resultsCompared with baseline, both the visual analog scale and the Anterior Knee Pain Scale improved for patients with PFP in both the HIP and KNEE protocols (P < .001), but the visual analog scale scores for those in the HIP protocol were reduced 1 week earlier than in the KNEE group. Both groups increased in strength (P < .001), but those in the HIP protocol gained more in hip-abductor (P = .01) and -extensor (P = .01) strength and posterior core endurance (P = .05) compared with the KNEE group.

conclusionsBoth the HIP and KNEE rehabilitation protocols produced improvements in PFP, function, and strength over 6 weeks. Although outcomes were similar, the HIP protocol resulted in earlier resolution of pain and greater overall gains in strength compared with the KNEE protocol.

Indexed as

AdultAthletic InjuriesChronic PainFemaleHipHumansKnee JointMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMusculoskeletal PainPain MeasurementPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeResistance TrainingRunningSelf Reportanterior knee painclinical trialknee rehabilitationoutcomes assessmentpatella

Identifiers

PMID25365133
PMCPMC4560005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.