Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25365062›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Genome-scale reconstruction of metabolic networks of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 and 12A.

Elena Vinay-Lara, Joshua J Hamilton, Buffy Stahl, Jeff R Broadbent, Jennifer L Reed, James L Steele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Constraint-based modeling in microbial food biotechnology.Biochemical Society transactions · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Lactobacillus casei as a biocatalyst for biofuel production.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2016
    Article
  18. Metabolic network modeling of microbial communities.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elena Vinay-LaraDepartment of Food Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Joshua J HamiltonDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Buffy StahlDuPont Nutrition and Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Jeff R BroadbentUtah State University Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Sciences, Logan, Utah, United States of America.
Jennifer L ReedDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
James L SteeleDepartment of Food Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacillus casei strains are widely used in industry and the utility of this organism in these industrial applications is strain dependent. Hence, tools capable of predicting strain specific phenotypes would have utility in the selection of strains for specific industrial processes. Genome-scale metabolic models can be utilized to better understand genotype-phenotype relationships and to compare different organisms. To assist in the selection and development of strains with enhanced industrial utility, genome-scale models for L. casei ATCC 334, a well characterized strain, and strain 12A, a corn silage isolate, were constructed. Draft models were generated from RAST genome annotations using the Model SEED database and refined by evaluating ATP generating cycles, mass-and-charge-balances of reactions, and growth phenotypes. After the validation process was finished, we compared the metabolic networks of these two strains to identify metabolic, genetic and ortholog differences that may lead to different phenotypic behaviors. We conclude that the metabolic capabilities of the two networks are highly similar. The L. casei ATCC 334 model accounts for 1,040 reactions, 959 metabolites and 548 genes, while the L. casei 12A model accounts for 1,076 reactions, 979 metabolites and 640 genes. The developed L. casei ATCC 334 and 12A metabolic models will enable better understanding of the physiology of these organisms and be valuable tools in the development and selection of strains with enhanced utility in a variety of industrial applications.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMetabolic Networks and PathwaysCarbohydrate MetabolismComputational BiologyGene DeletionGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLacticaseibacillus caseiMolecular Sequence AnnotationMolecular Sequence Data

Identifiers

PMID25365062
PMCPMC4231531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.