ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2014
Spatial cognitive rehabilitation and motor recovery after stroke.
Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concurrent tDCS-fMRI after stroke reveals link between attention network organization and motor improvement.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Frontal lesions predict response to prism adaptation treatment in spatial neglect: A randomised controlled study.Neuropsychological rehabilitation · 2020Trial
- Effect of the Wii Sports Resort on the improvement in attention, processing speed and working memory in moderate stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019Trial
- Enhancing Cardiopulmonary Function Through Spasticity Reduction-Effects of Botulinum Toxin A After Stroke: A Prospective Before-After Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Modeling Upper Limb Rehabilitation-Induced Recovery After Stroke: The Role of Attention as a Clinical Confounder.Physical therapy · 2025Article
- Relationships Between Cognitive Impairments and Motor Learning After Stroke: A Scoping Review.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2025Article
- Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) Is Also Relevant for Computer, Smartphone, and Tablet Use by Adults: Introducing the Brief Box Clicking Test.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2024Article
- Does visuospatial neglect contribute to standing balance within the first 12 weeks post-stroke? A prospective longitudinal cohort study.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Fostering human learning in sequential decision-making: Understanding the role of evaluative feedback.PloS one · 2024Article
- A Multicomponent Educational and Rehabilitation Approach in Optimizing Outcomes During the Poststroke Subacute Phase.Acta medica Lituanic · 2024Article
- Case report: Symmetrical and increased lateral sway-based walking training for patients with corpus callosum infarction: a case series.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Prediction of rehabilitation induced motor recovery after stroke using a multi-dimensional and multi-modal approach.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Prism Adaptation Treatment Predicts Improved Rehabilitation Responses in Stroke Patients with Spatial Neglect.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Spatial neglect treatment: The brain's spatial-motor Aiming systems.Neuropsychological rehabilitation · 2022Review
- Influence of visual feedback persistence on visuo-motor skill improvement.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- SLAM-based augmented reality for the assessment of short-term spatial memory. A comparative study of visual versus tactile stimuli.PloS one · 2021Article
- Sensorimotor, Attentional, and Neuroanatomical Predictors of Upper Limb Motor Deficits and Rehabilitation Outcome after Stroke.Neural plasticity · 2021Article
- The development of a cognitive rehabilitation task for mice.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2020Article
- Exploratory examination of lexical and neuroanatomic correlates of neglect dyslexia.Neuropsychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewStroke rehabilitation needs to take major steps forward to reduce functional disability for survivors. In this article, we suggest that spatial retraining might greatly increase the efficiency and efficacy of motor rehabilitation, directly addressing the burden and cost of paralysis after stroke. RECENT
findingsCombining motor and cognitive treatment may be practical, as well as addressing the needs after moderate-to-severe stroke. Spatial neglect could suppress motor recovery and reduce motor learning, even when patients receive appropriate rehabilitation to build strength, dexterity, and endurance. Spatial neglect rehabilitation acts to promote motor as well as visual-perceptual recovery. These findings, and the previous underemphasized studies, make a strong case for combining spatial neglect treatment with traditional exercise training. Spatial neglect therapies might also provide motor stimulation if people cannot participate in intensive movement therapies because of limited strength and endurance after stroke. SUMMARY: Spatial retraining, currently used selectively after right-brain stroke, may be broadly useful after stroke to promote rapid motor recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.