Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25364879›Full record

ArticleHealth care for women international2016

Decision Making About Method of Delivery on the U.S.-Mexico Border.

Carla L DeSisto, Jill A McDonald, Roger Rochat, Beatriz A Diaz-Apodaca, Eugene Declercq

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care for women international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carla L DeSistoa Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health , Emory University , Atlanta , Georgia , USA.
Jill A McDonaldb College of Health and Social Services, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico; and Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion , Atlanta , Georgia , USA.
Roger Rochata Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health , Emory University , Atlanta , Georgia , USA.
Beatriz A Diaz-Apodacac Health Science Department, Biomedical Sciences Institute , Autonomous University of Ciudad Juárez , Ciudad Juárez , Mexico.
Eugene Declercqd Community Health Sciences , Boston University School of Public Health , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Emory University · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored how low-risk, nulliparous pregnant women and their doctors in two contiguous U.S.-Mexico border communities communicate about methods of delivery and how they perceive that the delivery method decision is made. We recruited 18 women through obstetricians in El Paso, Texas (n = 10), and prenatal care providers in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico (n = 8). We observed prenatal care visits, interviewed women prenatally and postpartum, and interviewed the El Paso obstetricians. Qualitative analysis demonstrated that birthing decisions are complex and involve multiple influences, including women's level of knowledge about birth, doctor-patient communication, and women's participation in decision making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMexicoParityPregnancyPregnant PeopleQualitative ResearchTape Recording

Identifiers

PMID25364879
PMCPMC4580528
OpenAlexW1968931831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.