Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25364782›Full record

ArticleIEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology proceedings. IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology2012

Matrix Factorization for Transcriptional Regulatory Network Inference.

Michael F Ochs, Elana J Fertig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology proceedings. IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Integration of single-cell multi-omics for gene regulatory network inference.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael F OchsSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Elana J FertigSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Identifying Malignant Cell Signaling from Protein Interactions an Polyomic DataK25CA141053 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FERTIG, ELANA · 2010 to 2014
$419k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA141053NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inference of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks (TRNs) provides insight into the mechanisms driving biological systems, especially mammalian development and disease. Many techniques have been developed for TRN estimation from indirect biochemical measurements. Although successful when initially tested in model organisms, these regulatory models often fail when applied to data from multicellular organisms where multiple regulation and gene reuse increase dramatically. Non-negative matrix factorization techniques were initially introduced to find non-orthogonal patterns in data, making them ideal techniques for inference in cases of multiple regulation. We review these techniques and their application to TRN analysis.

Indexed as

Bayesian statisticsMatrix factorizationNMFTranscriptional Regulatory Network

Identifiers

PMID25364782
PMCPMC4212829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.