Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25364766›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2014

Integrative analysis of multiple diverse omics datasets by sparse group multitask regression.

Dongdong Lin, Jigang Zhang, Jingyao Li, Hao He, Hong-Wen Deng, Yu-Ping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Editorial: Multi-omic data integration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2015
    Article
  11. Integrating Imaging Genomic Data in the Quest for Biomarkers of Schizophrenia Disease.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dongdong LinBiomedical Engineering Department, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA ; Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA.
Jigang ZhangCenter for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA ; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA.
Jingyao LiBiomedical Engineering Department, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA ; Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA.
Hao HeCenter for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA ; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA.
Hong-Wen DengCenter for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA ; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA.
Yu-Ping WangBiomedical Engineering Department, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA ; Center for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA ; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Tulane University New Orleans, LA, USA.

Funding

Proteome-wide Expression Study of Osteogenic CellsP50AR055081 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2007 to 2012
$5.0M
ROBUST AND POWERFUL TEST OF CANDIDATE GENES TO BONE MASSR01AR050496 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2004 to 2013
$3.8M
Epigenomewide DNA Methylation Study for Osteoporosis RiskR01AR059781 · NIAMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
Identification of Proteins Important for Male OsteoporosisR01AR057049 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
Genomic search for bone mass QTLsR01AG026564 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI DENG, HONG-WEN · 2007 to 2010
$2.3M
Integration of brain imaging with genomic and epigenomic dataR01MH104680 · NIMH · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, DENG, HONG-WEN · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
Integration of multiscale genomic data for comprehensive analysis of complex diseR01GM109068 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI WANG, YU-PING · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR055081NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050496NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR057049NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059781NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026564NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109068NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of high throughput genome-wide assays enable the exploration of genetic risk factors underlying complex traits. Although these studies have remarkable impact on identifying susceptible biomarkers, they suffer from issues such as limited sample size and low reproducibility. Combining individual studies of different genetic levels/platforms has the promise to improve the power and consistency of biomarker identification. In this paper, we propose a novel integrative method, namely sparse group multitask regression, for integrating diverse omics datasets, platforms, and populations to identify risk genes/factors of complex diseases. This method combines multitask learning with sparse group regularization, which will: (1) treat the biomarker identification in each single study as a task and then combine them by multitask learning; (2) group variables from all studies for identifying significant genes; (3) enforce sparse constraint on groups of variables to overcome the "small sample, but large variables" problem. We introduce two sparse group penalties: sparse group lasso and sparse group ridge in our multitask model, and provide an effective algorithm for each model. In addition, we propose a significance test for the identification of potential risk genes. Two simulation studies are performed to evaluate the performance of our integrative method by comparing it with conventional meta-analysis method. The results show that our sparse group multitask method outperforms meta-analysis method significantly. In an application to our osteoporosis studies, 7 genes are identified as significant genes by our method and are found to have significant effects in other three independent studies for validation. The most significant gene SOD2 has been identified in our previous osteoporosis study involving the same expression dataset. Several other genes such as TREML2, HTR1E, and GLO1 are shown to be novel susceptible genes for osteoporosis, as confirmed from other studies.

Indexed as

group lassomultitask learningosteoporosissignificant testsparse regression

Identifiers

PMID25364766
PMCPMC4209817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.