ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2014
Integrative analysis of multiple diverse omics datasets by sparse group multitask regression.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sparse multitask group Lasso for genome-wide association studies.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Advancing translational research in neuroscience through multi-task learning.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
- Vertical integration methods for gene expression data analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Ontology-based metabolomics data integration with quality control.Bioanalysis · 2019Article
- Enforcing Co-Expression Within a Brain-Imaging Genomics Regression Framework.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2018Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Strategies for Analyzing Big Data in Psychiatry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Rise of Deep Learning for Genomic, Proteomic, and Metabolomic Data Integration in Precision Medicine.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2018Review
- A novel scoring system for acute myeloid leukemia risk assessment based on the expression levels of six genes.International journal of molecular medicine · 2018Article
- Mixed Linear Model Approaches of Association Mapping for Complex Traits Based on Omics Variants.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Editorial: Multi-omic data integration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2015Article
- Integrating Imaging Genomic Data in the Quest for Biomarkers of Schizophrenia Disease.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A variety of high throughput genome-wide assays enable the exploration of genetic risk factors underlying complex traits. Although these studies have remarkable impact on identifying susceptible biomarkers, they suffer from issues such as limited sample size and low reproducibility. Combining individual studies of different genetic levels/platforms has the promise to improve the power and consistency of biomarker identification. In this paper, we propose a novel integrative method, namely sparse group multitask regression, for integrating diverse omics datasets, platforms, and populations to identify risk genes/factors of complex diseases. This method combines multitask learning with sparse group regularization, which will: (1) treat the biomarker identification in each single study as a task and then combine them by multitask learning; (2) group variables from all studies for identifying significant genes; (3) enforce sparse constraint on groups of variables to overcome the "small sample, but large variables" problem. We introduce two sparse group penalties: sparse group lasso and sparse group ridge in our multitask model, and provide an effective algorithm for each model. In addition, we propose a significance test for the identification of potential risk genes. Two simulation studies are performed to evaluate the performance of our integrative method by comparing it with conventional meta-analysis method. The results show that our sparse group multitask method outperforms meta-analysis method significantly. In an application to our osteoporosis studies, 7 genes are identified as significant genes by our method and are found to have significant effects in other three independent studies for validation. The most significant gene SOD2 has been identified in our previous osteoporosis study involving the same expression dataset. Several other genes such as TREML2, HTR1E, and GLO1 are shown to be novel susceptible genes for osteoporosis, as confirmed from other studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.