Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25364600›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medical and health sciences research2014

Drivers of prenatal care quality and uptake of supervised delivery services in ghana.

Ra Atinga, Aa Baku, Pb Adongo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medical and health sciences research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Perceptions of Good-Quality Antenatal Care and Birthing Services among Postpartum Women in Nepal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ra AtingaDepartment of Public Administration and Health Services Management, University of Ghana Business School, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Aa BakuDepartment of Public Administration and Health Services Management, University of Ghana Business School, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Pb AdongoDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Legon, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn spite of the introduction of free maternal healthcare in Ghana, utilization of supervised delivery services continues to be low due partly to poor quality of antenatal care (ANC).

aimThe study sought to identify the determinants of perceived quality of ANC and uptake of skilled delivery services. SUBJECTS AND

methodsA total of 363 expectant mothers were randomly selected in urban health facilities for interview. Logistic regression models were computed to examine the relative odds of reporting quality of antenatal as good and the intention to receive skilled delivery care.

resultsThe odds of reporting ANC quality as good was high for women aged between 30 and 34 years. Perceived quality of ANC increases with increasing access to education but more likely to be higher for women attaining senior high education. Distance to the health facility influences quality perception, but the odds of reporting quality of care as good attenuated with proximity to the health facility. Finally, uptake of supervised delivery services was high for women aged between 35 and 39 years, women with at least junior high education; living close to the health facility and in their second and third trimester.

conclusionStudy's findings demonstrate the need to improve the quality of maternal health services in public health facilities to encourage women to deliver under skilled care providers.

Indexed as

Antenatal careExpectant mothersGhanaQualitySkilled care

Identifiers

PMID25364600
PMCPMC4212388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.