ArticleAnnals of medical and health sciences research2014
Knowledge of Asthma among Doctors Practicing in Three South Eastern States of Nigeria.
Article in Annals of medical and health sciences research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Healthcare professionals' level of medication knowledge in Africa: a systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of pharmacists regarding asthma management: a cross-sectional study in Egypt.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2022Article
- Assessment of family and internal medicine physicians knowledge and practice of bronchial asthma at Riyadh city.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- Implementation of GINA guidelines in asthma management by primary care physicians in Vietnam.International journal of general medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma is a chronic airway disease that has a significant impact on patients with substantial global socioeconomic burden. Appropriate knowledge by health care practitioners is important in the management of asthma.
aimThe aim was to assess the knowledge of asthma among doctors practicing in health care facilities in three South-Eastern states of Nigeria. SUBJECTS AND
methodsThis was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The participants were selected using multi-staged sampling method and interviewed with structured, self-administered questionnaires. Comparison of the different outcome variables using the Chi-square (categorical) and Student's t-test (noncategorical) with the characteristics of the participants were done.
resultA total of 283 doctors were interviewed. Eighty-eight percent of them identified asthma as a common disease in our environment, (P = 0.04) but unrelated to socioeconomic status. Knowledge of epidemiology was poor among medical officers and registrars (P = 0.04). Most of the doctors (80%)(226/283) recognized the pathogenic significance of bronchospasm in exacerbation, while 58.6% (166/283) of them considered chronic inflammation as a significant factor in asthma pathogenesis P < 0.001. Majority of the doctors (84.1%) (238/283) were aware of the use of steroids in acute exacerbation, while 59.4% (168/283) considered aminophylline as the first line medication in exacerbation (P = 0.02). Knowledge about the use of steroids as controller medication was noted in 1.7% (5/283) of the respondents. Only 47.3% (134/283) of the participants were aware of the Global Initiative on Asthma guideline, (P = 0.03).
conclusionThere was good knowledge of epidemiology and clinical features of asthma, but a small number of the doctors had knowledge of pathophysiology and treatment of the disease. For best practices in asthma management, there is a need for further education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.