ArticleOncology letters2014
Serum and saliva protein levels in females with breast cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Salivary biomarkers in breast cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Blood and Saliva Composition in Cancer: Similarities or Differences?Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Extracting Knowledge from Machine Learning Models to Diagnose Breast Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles in Human Bowel Lavage Fluid.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Prognostic Value of Salivary Biochemical Indicators in Primary Resectable Breast Cancer.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Association of salivary Cathepsin B in different histological grades among patients presenting with oral squamous cell carcinoma.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Metabolic Features of Saliva in Breast Cancer Patients.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Biochemical Evaluation of Carbonic Anhydrase and Some Antioxidant Markers in Patients with Diabetes Complications.Archives of Razi Institute · 2022Article
- Over-expression of SRD5A3 and its prognostic significance in breast cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Expression of Axl and its prognostic significance in human breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2017Article
- Pyruvic acid levels in serum and saliva: A new course for oral cancer screening?Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the change in the total protein content between the serum and saliva of female patients with breast cancer and in healthy females. The study was conducted between October 2012 and November 2013. There were 80 females in the present study with 40 breast cancer patients and 40 healthy control subjects, with an age range of 50-70 years. The results of the study showed that the mean value ± standard deviation of the total serum protein in patients with breast cancer was 7.63±0.41 g/dl, whereas in the healthy subjects it was 6.14±1.84 g/dl. The total salivary protein measurement was 0.14±0.07 g/dl and 0.25±0.09 g/dl in the breast cancer and healthy group, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the total serum protein was higher in female patients with breast cancer, whereas the levels in the saliva were lower compared to the healthy female group. The results of the present study indicate that serum protein levels may be used for the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.